Decoding the implicit association test: Implications for criterion prediction

By Hart Blanton, James Jaccard, Patricia M. Gonzales, Charlene Christie. 2006

217 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0dc4b3a32a6e2b42f839166f81e76305a49fa7e8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Untangling the links between narcissism and self‐esteem: A theoretical and empirical review. (2008, unknown): “Finally, some theorists argue that the standard scoring method for the IAT involves several untested statistical assumptions, and data that do not meet these assumptions may yield invalid IAT scores (for a detailed analysis of this issue, see Blanton, Jaccard, Gonzales, & Christie, 2006 ).”
Unconscious Racism: A Concept in Pursuit of a Measure (2008, background): “…in cognitive psychology on GPS, and studies have found it to be correlated with (or confounded with) such individual difference variables as intelligence, age, alcohol use, a host of cognitive deficit variables, and even attitude constructs like explicit racism (see Blanton et al. 2006, 2008b).”
Unresolved problems with the “I”, the “A”, and the “T”: A logical and psychometric critique of the Implicit Association Test (IAT) (2006, methodology): “All trial subsets—being fast on the response keys for Germanþ positive and for Turkishþ negative, and being slow in sorting Germanþ negative and Turkishþ positive trials—receive the same weight (Blanton et al., 2006).”
Assessment of Individual Differences in Implicit Cognition A Review of IAT Measures (2008, unknown): “As a measure of associations between two unipolar categories, Blanton, Jaccard, Gonzales, and Christie (2006) developed the Single Association Test (SAT).”
The existence of implicit bias is beyond reasonable doubt: A refutation of ideological and methodological objections and executive summary of ten studies that no manager should ignore (2009, unknown): “…to succeed, they would need to debunk not merely the same handful of IAT studies that Arkes and Tetlock (2004), Mitchell and Tetlock (2006), Blanton, Jaccard, Gonzales, and Christie (2006), and Wax (2008) have repeatedly picked on and picked over (i.e., the studies by McConnell & Leibold,…”