Cross-Sector Alliance Learning and Effectiveness of Voluntary Codes of Corporate Social Responsibility
By Bindu Arya, J. Salk. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2006
172 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Business and International Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ac0af187d4d714bc6d1b4803978ded65be49e6da
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Business and International Management
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- An Analysis of Cause-Related Marketing Implementation Strategies Through Social Alliance: Partnership Conditions and Strategic Objectives (2011, background): “On the other hand, the social alliance delivery pattern involves a partnership between the company and non-profit organisation (NPO), in which the parties work jointly towards the development and implementation of a CRM campaign (Arya and Salk, 2006; Berger et al., 2004; Strahilevitz, 1999).”
- Input and output legitimacy of multi-stakeholder initiatives (2012, background): “Some TNCs self-regulate their behavior by creating and enforcing codes of conduct for their own operations, and sometimes also for their suppliers’ (Arya & Salk, 2006; Sethi, 2003; van Tulder & Kolk, 2001), they set environmental management systems that go beyond state requirements (Christmann &…”
- Uneasy Alliances: Lessons Learned from Partnerships Between Businesses and NGOs in the context of CSR (2009, background): “The interactions of these two actors are no longer restricted to philanthropy and charity but have exhibited increased diversity in recent years, with a range of alliances addressing environmental issues and codes of conduct (Arya and Salk, 2006).”
- How global is international CSR research? Insights and recommendations from a systematic review (2017, background): “…ground their work on institutional theory (e.g., Aguilera & Jackson, 2003; Gilbert, Rasche, & Waddock, 2011; Helfen & Sydow, 2013), whereas at the organization level, a greater diversity of theories emerges (e.g., Arya & Salk, 2006; Besiou, Hunter, & Van Wassenhove, 2013; Chakrabarty & Wang, 2012).”