Indigenous Chinese Personality Constructs

By Fanny M. Cheung, K. Leung, Jianxin Zhang, Hai-Fa Sun, Yiqun Gan, Wei-Zhen Song, D. Xie. 2001

424 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aaff3e0aa0c037646c21351861fa92b7f3ef2697

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The role of relational orientation as measured by face and renqing in innovative behavior in China: An indigenous analysis (2014, background): “As described before, this indigenous personality inventory overlaps with the five-factor model of personality, but it yields a unique dimension, labeled as interpersonal relatedness (Cheung et al., 2001).”
Culture's Consequences on Student Motivation: Capturing Cross-Cultural Universality and Variability Through Personal Investment Theory (2014, background): “One such example is the aforementioned Chinese Tradition/Interpersonal Relatedness factor, which research has shown to demonstrate incremental predictive validity even after taking into account the variance associated with the Big Five model (Cheung et al., 2001).”
Colonialism and Psychology of Culture (2008, background): “…with indigenous psychology movements in other East Asian nations such as Taiwan (e.g., Yang, 2006), South Korea (e.g., Kim et al., 1999) and China (e.g., Cheung et al., 2001) seem to emphasize the Western hegemony of psychological theories and methods without alluding to colonial discourses.”
Beyond Total Effects: Exploring the Interplay of Personality and Attitudes in Affecting Turnout in the 2009 German Federal Election (2013, background): “…to an agreement that the Five-Factor-Model, aka the Big Five, is the most appropriate concept to describe personality in various cultures (e.g., Goldberg 1993, John et al. 1988; John 1990; Ostendorf & Angleitner 1994; Saucier & Goldberg 1996; McCrae & Costa 1997; but see also Cheung et al. 2001).”
Use of Western and Indigenously Developed Personality Tests in Asia (2004, methodology): “Initial cross-cultural studies involving non-Chinese samples suggest that the Interpersonal Relatedness factor also may be relevant in non-Chinese cultures (Cheung et al., 2001; Cheung, Cheung, Leung, Ward, & Leong, 2003).”
The English Version of the Chinese Personality Assessment Inventory (2003, background): “As suggested by Church (2001), one question related to indigenous measures is whether “they contribute incremental validity beyond that provided by imported measures” (p. 987).”
Origins and development of indigenous psychologies: An international analysis (2006, background): “In the field of personality assessment, Fanny Cheung and her colleagues have adopted a combined emic‐etic approach to develop a personality inventory that includes both universal and culturally salient personality dimensions that make up the personality structure of the Chinese people (Cheung et al,”
Prospects for an integrated trait and cultural psychology (2009, background): “…studies that measure and relate indigenous personality concepts (e.g. Japanese amae; Filipino kapwa) to hypothesised universal dimensions (e.g. see Cheung et al., 2001; Katigbak et al., 2002; Ortiz et al., 2006); (h) more cross-cultural studies of accuracy and self-enhancement Copyright # 2009…”
Marital quality, maternal depressed affect, harsh parenting, and child externalising in Hong Kong Chinese families (2004, background): “CPAI-2 (or, previously, CPAI), is an indigenous Chinese measure that has been validated in different Chinese populations (e.g., Cheung et al., 2001b).”