Tilting the Table? The Use of Preliminary Injunctions*

By J. Lanjouw, Josh Lerner. Journal law and economy, 2001

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Reputations for toughness in patent enforcement: implications for knowledge spillovers via inventor mobility (2009, unknown): “These findings contribute new evidence to that offered by a handful of studies exploring how the high costs of patent enforcement may tilt advantage toward firms with superior resource endowments (Lerner, 1995; Lanjouw and Lerner, 2001; Lanjouw and Schankerman, 2001).”
On sharks, trolls, and their patent prey—Unrealistic damage awards and firms’ strategies of “being infringed” (2007, background): “The law xplicitly supports this form of exploitation, offering varous remedies to patent holders whose rights are being nfringed—no matter whether the patentee uses its proected technology or not (see Lanjouw and Lerner, 2001; chankerman and Scotchmer, 2001).”
The Impact of Uncertain Intellectual Property Rights on the Market for Ideas: Evidence from Patent Grant Delays (2008, background): “While an extensive literature examines the role of uncertainty in patent licensing, and the drivers of patent licensing and patent litigation settlement (e.g., Katz and Shapiro, 1986; Gallini and Winter, 1985; Lanjouw and Lerner, 2001; Schankerman and Scotchmer, 2001), these studies do not explicitl”