Interrater reliability and agreement.

428 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Perceived Challenge, Teacher Support, and Teacher Obstruction as Predictors of Student Engagement (2017, methodology): “Given that each IE was coded for presence/absence of the support and obstruction constructs, percent interrater agreement is an appropriate indicator of reliability (Tinsley & Weiss, 1975, 2000).”
An Assessment of Reliability and Validity of a Rubric for Grading APA-Style Introductions (2009, background): “These criteria are accepted in the measurement literature (Tinsley & Weiss, 2000) and have been applied in past studies of interrater agreement for grading rubrics (Newell et al., 2002).”
Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability (2002, methodology): “Although this term is appropriate and will be used here, Tinsley and Weiss (1975, 2000) note that the more specific term for the type of consistency required in content analysis is intercoder (or interrater) agreement.”
Measuring and promoting inter-rater agreement of teacher and principal performance ratings. (2012, background): “Therefore, two evaluators who have little to no agreement could still have high inter-rater reliability (Tinsley & Weiss, 2000).”