University–incubator firm knowledge flows: assessing their impact on incubator firm performance

By Frank T. Rothaermel, Marie C. Thursby. 2005

430 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a8dc673c6d216859189d01dd17fe6124e5a6ef98

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Beyond incubation: an analysis of firm survival and exit dynamics in the post-graduation period (2009, background): “First, assuming that those firms were successful after leaving the BIs, those firms may be count as survivors (e.g., Rothaermel and Thursby 2005b ).”
Critical Role and Screening Practices of European Business Incubators (2007, background): “Rothaermel and Thursby (2005) assess the impact of university–incubator firm knowledge flows on tenant performance, measured by revenues, total funds raised, venture capital funding obtained and whether the firm graduated, failed, or remained in the incubator.”
University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature (2007, background): “Rothaermel and Thursby (2005b) How does knowledge flow from universities to incubator firms?”
Specialization as strategy for business incubators: An assessment of the Central German Multimedia Center (2008, background): “Following Rothaermel and Thursby (2005), who investigate the impact of knowledge flows between a university and a technology incubator on incubator firm performance, the absorptive capacity of the tenants appears to play a crucial role in the transfer and transformation of university knowledge into…”
Show Me the Right Stuff: Signals for High Tech Startups (2013, neutral): “For admission, applicant companies must pass a two-stage review by ATDC managers and only between 10% and 20% are eventually admitted (Rothaermel and Thursby, 2005b).”
Revisiting incubation performance (2012, neutral): “Other measures of performance less frequently used are backward patent citations for university incubates [32], the adoption of advanced information and communication technologies as well as participation in R&D programs promoted by the EC [9].”
Knowledge sharing, absorptive capacity, and innovation capability: an empirical study of Taiwan's knowledge-intensive industries (2007, background): “Rothaermel and Thursby [25] find that incubator firms’ absorptive capacity is an important factor when transforming university knowledge into firm-level competitive advantage.”
Knowledge flow in Technological Business Incubators: Evidence from Australia and Israel (2015, background): “Rothaermel and Thursby (2005a) suggest that incubatees may transform university knowledge into competitive advantage if they have the sufficient absorptive capacity.”
Building an innovation hub: A case study of the transformation of university roles in regional technological and economic development (2008, background): “A survey of 79 ATDC members and graduates from 1998 to 2003 and analysis of patent citations found that amount of funding obtained and backward linkages to university research are evidenced in successful graduating companies (Rothaermel and Thursby, 2005).”