Time to Break Up: Social and Instrumental Antecedents of Firm Exits from Exchange Cliques

By Tim Rowley, Henrich R. Greve, Hayagreeva Rao, Joel A. C. Baum, Andrew V. Shipilov. 2005

150 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a8dae15303e968d60ac0df4995fb19b770e03b3d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Can you have your Cake and Eat it too? Structural Holes' Influence on Status Accumulation and Market Performance in Collaborative Networks (2008, background): “…a means for firms to improve their positions in the industry hierarchy, which involves building clique-spanning ties (Baum, Shipilov, and Rowley, 2003), positioning within functionally differentiated cliques (Rowley et al., 2004, 2005), or forming new venture financing syndicates (Podolny, 2001).”
A Matching Theory of Alliance Formation and Organizational Success: Complementarity and Compatibility (2009, result): “Consistent with this reasoning, previous studies have found that firms with complementary resources are more likely to collaborate (Chung, Singh, & Lee, 2000; Gulati, 1995; Powell et al., 2005; Rowley et al., 2005; Stuart, 1998).”
Exploring the Locus of Invention: The Dynamics of Network Communities and Firms' Invention Productivity (2014, background): “The other exception are the two recent studies by Rowley et al. (2004; 2005) that examine how the heterogeneity of firms in a community can affect a firm’s decision to leave the community, and show that this heterogeneity can also affect the member firm’s market performance.”
Dancing with Strangers: Aspiration Performance and the Search for Underwriting Syndicate Partners (2005, unknown): “For example, larger, more established 566/ASQ, December 2005 banks may be attracted to their smaller, younger counterparts because their power and status differential would allow them to negotiate advantageous fee arrangements (Rowley et al., 2005).”
Interorganizational Networks at the Network Level: A Review of the Empirical Literature on Whole Networks (2007, background): “For instance, how does network homophily 508 Journal of Management / June 2007 (i.e., similarity of members) or its clique structure (Rowley et al., 2005) enhance or constrain the ways in which the network can grow?”