The Era of Open Innovation

By H. Chesbrough. 2003

3,454 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a85f1441a0117577649d8c77e93c0f018ecce32c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Marcel Bogers
2. J. Love
3. S. Roper
4. Keld Laursen
5. Joel West
6. Mark Freel
7. H. Chesbrough
8. N. J. Foss

Citations in the corpus

• Turning Open Innovation into Practice: Open Innovation Research through the Lens of Managers (2011, background): “Henry Chesbrough defined OI as a model in which firms commercialize external (as well as internal) ideas by deploying outside (as well as inside) pathways to market (Chesbrough, 2003b).”
• Co-ownership of intellectual property: Exploring the value-appropriation and value-creation implications of co-patenting with different partners (2014, background): “Introduction The open-innovation paradigm conceives Research and Develpment (R&D) as an open system where firms can benefit from variety of collaborative activities with external knowledge artners (Chesbrough, 2003, 2006).”
• Open Innovation in Practice: An Analysis of Strategic Approaches to Technology Transactions (2008, background): “Despite a trend toward open innovation [5], [39], [43], many firms seem to be”
• Determinants and Archetype Users of Open Innovation (2009, background): “Few contributions discuss factors on which the variation of OI intensity across firms may be contingent (e.g., Chesbrough, 2003a; Christensen et al., 2005); however, even these few discuss these factors on the industry or portray them as a result of meta-level technological change.”
• The Role of Foreign Technology and Indigenous Innovation in the Emerging Economies: Technological Change and Catching Up (2010, background): “Third, the greater use of external knowledge is accompanied by a parallel decrease of the presence of internal R&D departments (Chesbrough, 2003; Howells, James, & Malik, 2004), especially in research-intensive industries (Bönte, 2003).”
• The Productivity Effects of Internal and External R&D: Evidence From a Dynamic Panel Data Model (2008, unknown): “R&D outsourcing, however, is not limited to standard research or development tasks but includes strategic research projects where partner firms and partner institutions possess complementary technological capabilities not available in-house (e.g. Pisano, 1990; Bönte, 2003; Chesbrough, 2003).”
• Open Innovation 4.0 as an Enhancer of Sustainable Innovation Ecosystems (2020, background): “This model of innovation was firstly proposed in 2003, redirecting the flows of knowledge and the innovation strategies to boost collaboration among firms and other agents inside and outside the value chain, shifting towards a co-innovation paradigm in which the firm speeds up the innovation pace an”
• Appropriation strategies and open innovation in SMEs (2016, background): “This change offers novel ways to create value – along with new opportunities to claim portions of that value’ (Chesbrough, 2003b: 41; emphasis added).”
• On the relationship between supplier integration and time-to-market (2013, background): “…such as enterprise software (Russel and Hoag, 2004), RFID (Ranganathan and Jha, 2005), web enabled supply chain management systems (Ranganathan et al., 2004), e-business technologies (Hsu et al., 2006), agile development (Martin, 2003; Cockburn, 2006), and open innovation (Chesbrough, 2003).”
• Managing Distributed Innovation: Strategic Utilization of Open and User Innovation (2012, unknown): “Free spillovers can moreover come from innovation benefactors such as universities (Chesbrough, 2003b).”
• The Value of Crowdsourcing: Can Users Really Compete with Professionals in Generating New Product Ideas? (2012, background): “…many different populations, this study focuses on potential customers or users (for alternative populations, cf. Jeppesen and Lakhani 2009; for related approaches to open innovation or external sources of innovation through innovation tournaments, cf. Chesbrough 2003, Terwiesch and Ulrich 2009).”
• Corporate accelerators: Building bridges between corporations and startups (2016, background): “By adapting open innovation–—the paradigm that assumes firms should use external and internal ideas and internal and external paths to market (Chesbrough, 2003b)–—established businesses are building structured programs to harness entrepreneurial power (Horn, 2014; Mocker, 2015).”