Teaching coaches to coach holistically: can Problem-Based Learning (PBL) help?

By Robyn L. Jones, P. Turner. 2006

174 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a85923d39fef554c2334b5466277da3779643014

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Education

Citations in the corpus

Why do children take part in, and remain involved in sport? A literature review and discussion of implications for sports coaches (2013, background): “The use of questioning has also been recommended as an effective coaching intervention strategy in the quest to increase children’s decision-making opportunities (Jones & Turner, 2006).”
Coach Learning and Development: A Review of Literature (2010, background): “Such an approach to coach development and learning should help avoid what Jones and Turner (2006) describe as the „reality shock‟ of assuming an actual coaching position within a given coaching context.”
Career Development of Expert Coaches (2009, background): “Studies have noted that declarative knowledge, taught in a breadth-first manner rather than a depth-first, forward reasoning manner, produced subjects who performed better in problem-solving situations [57-59].”
Carl Rogers, learning and educational practice: critical considerations and applications in sports coaching (2014, background): “…activity with its own contextual make-up, which is in constant flux, then awareness of this inherent complexity, diversity and assisting coaches in becoming capable of adapting to these contextual demands are appropriate ways to develop learning (Jones & Turner, 2006; Cushion et al., 2010).”
‘Studentship’ and ‘impression management’ in an advanced soccer coach education award (2010, background): “As such, coach educators may alternatively benefit from conceiving of their role as supportive facilitators in developing ‘a quality of mind’ in coaches that enables the latter to better deal with the problematic and contested nature of their work (Cassidy et al., 2004; Jones & Turner, 2006).”
Receiving video-based feedback in elite ice-hockey: a player's perspective (2014, result): “As such, the analysis presented in this study also supports the claim that coaching could be beneficially examined from an interdisciplinary perspective (Lyle, 2002; Jones & Turner, 2006), an approach that has had limited application in the coaching literature to date.”
Understanding Sports Coaching: The Social, Cultural and Pedagogical Foundations of Coaching Practice (2004, result): “In this respect, and in keeping with the literature in sports coaching (e.g., Jones 2000; Jones and Wallace 2005; Jones and Turner 2006), he argued that practice”
Youth sport volunteer coach motivation (2010, background): “Coaching is a complex, multi-faceted process (Jones and Turner, 2006), yet “virtually anyone can assume the role of a youth coach” (Gilbert and Trudel, 2001, p. 16).”
Developing coaching pedagogy: seeking a better integration of theory and practice (2012, background): “It was considered that such an innovative pedagogy would allow students an opportunity to better engage in the process of their own learning, thus increasing the relevancy of the experience (Jones & Turner, 2006).”
The Implicit/Explicit Continuum of Life Skills Development and Transfer (2018, background): “…terms, coaches can (a) involve athletes in decision-making and solution-finding processes, (b) provide a rationale for decisions, and (c) let athletes choose different activities or drills (Côté, Strachan, & Fraser-Thomas, 2008; Jones & Turner, 2006; Lockwood & Perlman, 2008; Mallett, 2005).”