A schematic–Theoretic view of problem solving and development of algebraic thinking
By D. Steele, D. Johanning. 2004
59 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a7326eaea2a51b781bcdfe38144c220ea429e439
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Visual templates in pattern generalization activity (2010, background): “On the basis of recent findings at the K-9 and preservice elementary undergraduate levels involving generalization in patterning activity, we still need further research in terms of how such coordination could take place more effectively in a systematic manner (Mulligan & Mitchelmore, 2009; Warren &”
- Schema-Based Instruction for Mathematical Word Problem Solving: An Evidence-Based Review for Students With Learning Disabilities (2020, background): “Schemas are assembled by continuously adding new layers of knowledge to form deeper and broader understanding of concepts (Steele & Johanning, 2004).”
- The Effect of the Differentiated Teaching Approach in the Algebraic Learning Field on Students’ Academic Achievements (2016, background): “Algebraic thinking periods refers to periods of recognizing and analyzing mathematical structures, understanding and identifying mathematical relations, making generalizations, and analyzing changes (Steele & Johanning, 2004).”
- Middle school children’s cognitive perceptions of constructive and deconstructive generalizations involving linear figural patterns (2008, background): “Steele and Johanning (2004) developed a teaching experiment in which eight US 7th graders were asked to generalize five linear and three quadratic problem situations that pertained to growth, change, size, and shape.”