Centralized and Decentralized Decision Making in Organizations

By Ján Zábojník. Journal of Labor Economics, 2002

195 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a719b684c5331a835bcff2b23d7da2adb8ede0dd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Michael Waldman
2. Kathryn L. Shaw
3. T. Lange
4. Casey Ichniowski
5. David J. Deming

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Michael Waldman
2. T. Lange
3. Kathryn L. Shaw
4. Casey Ichniowski

Citations in the corpus

• Theory and evidence in internal labor markets (2007, background): “Second, new technology means job rotation is valuable because the firm has little information about its current jobs.27 Zabojnik (2002) focuses on centralization versus decentralization.”
• Job satisfaction and self-employment: autonomy or personality? (2012, background): “Finally, it is worth noting that organisational economists have examined the importance of independent and autonomous decision freedom for some time (e.g. Williamson 1975; Aghion and Tirole 1997; Zabojnik 2002).”
• Beyond Incentive Pay: Insiders' Estimates of the Value of Complementary Human Resource Management Practices (2003, background): “Finally, if workers enjoy having an input in their choice of tasks or in solving problems, then higher levels of output can be achieved with lower-powered incentives (Zabojnik, 2002).”
• Organizational Beliefs and Managerial Vision (2005, unknown): “See also Zemsky (1994) on the value of intertemporal commitment provided by strategy.”