Co-Rumination in the Workplace: Adjustment Trade-offs for Men and Women Who Engage in Excessive Discussions of Workplace Problems

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Emotion regulation and psychopathology: the role of gender. (2012, background): “Unfortunately, the self-disclosure characteristic of female close relationships can backfire when it leads to co-rumination, defined as excessively discussing personal problems within a dyadic relationship (Haggard et al. 2011; Rose 2002, 2007; Rose et al. 2007).”
Motives for the social sharing of an emotional experience (2015, background): “In particular, Haggard, Robert, and Rose (2011) argued that compared to women, men are more inclined to see problem talk as a puzzle to be solved.”
The Relationships between Co-Rumination, Social Support, Stress, and Burnout among Working Adults (2014, methodology): “socially-supportive interaction (Haggard et al., 2010; Rose, 2002), has been associated with increased physical and psychological stress (Byrd-Craven et al.”
Customer Mistreatment, Employee Health, and Job Performance (2017, result): “Consistent with previous research (Haggard et al., 2011; McCance et al., 2013), the current findings showed that employees who experienced customer mistreatment discussed their negative experiences with others more frequently.”