Ethics in consumer choice: a multivariate modelling approach

By D. Shaw, Edward Shiu. 2003

407 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Plant Science, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a5d9c571bcf09831efba8540477fd3d0adad0016

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

1. J. Graafland
2. Caroline Moraes
3. Benjamin A. Neville
4. Michal J Carrington
5. Louise M. Hassan
6. G. Ryan
7. E. Papaoikonomou
8. Patrick De Pelsmacker

In Plant Science

1. Louise M. Hassan
2. Nina Michaelidou
3. G. Ryan
4. E. Papaoikonomou
5. Sam Blili
6. Valéry Bezençon
7. Caroline Moraes
8. Benjamin A. Neville

In Strategy and Management

1. J. Graafland
2. Benjamin A. Neville
3. Michal J Carrington
4. Louise M. Hassan
5. G. Ryan
6. E. Papaoikonomou
7. Paul F. Burke
8. Nina Michaelidou

Citations in the corpus

• The coherence of inconsistencies: Attitude–behaviour gaps and new consumption communities (2012, unknown): “…aspects of individual consumer behaviour (i.e. Ajzen, 1991; Ajzen & Fishbein, 1980; Allen & Ferrand, 1999; Bagozzi, 1993; Bagozzi & Warshaw, 1990; Chatzidakis, Hibbert, & Smith, 2007; Shaw, 2005; Shaw & Clarke, 1999; Shaw & Shiu, 2002, 2003; Shaw, Shiu, & Clarke, 2000; Sparks & Shepherd, 1992).”
• Ethically Minded Consumer Behavior:Scale Review, Development, and Validation (2016, unknown): “The theory has been criticized and subsequently extended (Shaw, Shiu and Clarke, 2000; Shaw and Shiu, 2003) but is useful in the current context for two reasons.”
• Fostering Responsible Communities: A Community Social Marketing Approach to Sustainable Living (2011, background): “…has led to a bias toward research examining the cognitive aspects of individual behavior and behavioral change (Chatzidakis et al., 2007; Shaw, 2005; Shaw and Clarke, 1999; Shaw and Shiu, 2003; Shaw et al., 2000; Sparks and Shepherd, 1992; Ajzen, 1991; Bagozzi, 1993; Bagozzi and Warshaw, 1990).”
• Mapping Ethical Consumer Behavior: Integrating the Empirical Research and Identifying Future Directions (2011, background): “Shaw and Shiu (2002, 2003) added self-identity and ethical obligation with an improvement in the predictive ability of the framework.”
• Segmenting consumers’ reasons for and against ethical consumption (2014, background): “Shaw and Shiu (2003) indicate that some consumers believe that premiums paid for ethical alternatives will never reach their intended beneficiaries.”
• Towards a Holistic Approach of the Attitude Behaviour Gap in Ethical Consumer Behaviours: Empirical Evidence from Spain (2011, methodology): “In recent times, much research has been focused on modelling ethical consumer behavior based on existing attitude-behavior models ( Shaw and Shiu 2003; Chatzidakis et al. 2007).”
• An Exploratory Study into the Factors Impeding Ethical Consumption (2011, background): “Participants in all focus groups believed that most of the extra premium they paid did not reach the end beneficiary and that much of it was intercepted by corporate or governmental organisations (Shaw and Shiu, 2003).”
• The role of health consciousness, food safety concern and ethical identity on attitudes and intentions towards organic food (2008, methodology): “The survey instrument was based on prior literature with attitude and intention measures developed based on Ajzen (1991), while ethical self identity was adapted from Shaw and Shiu (2003).”
• Ethical products and consumer involvement: what's new? (2010, methodology): “Following the enhancement of the theory of planned behaviour by Shaw and Shiu (2003) to fully apprehend the ethical aspect of consumption, this study confirms that the usual models analysing consumer behaviour need to be adapted in the context of ethical products.”