Cognitive neuroscience: Neural mechanisms for detecting and remembering novel events

By Charan Ranganath, G. Rainer. 2003

807 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Information seeking, curiosity and attention: computational and neural mechanisms (2013, neutral): “Sensory novelty, defined as a small number of stimulus exposures, is known to enhance neural responses throughout visual, frontal and temporal areas (Ranganath and Rainer 2003) and activate reward responsive dopamine-recipient areas.”
Adaptation and visual coding (2011, background): “It has the advantage of increasing metabolic efficiency (Lennie, 2003) and may also aid the visual system in detecting novelty (Barlow, 1990a; Gardner et al., 2005; Ranganath & Rainer, 2003).”
The role of multisensory memories in unisensory object discrimination. (2005, background): “, subjects focusing their attention to the auditory or somatosensory channel) or novel context detection [23,32] can therefore be discounted.”
The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review. (2007, background): “…of attention to a deviance in an unattended sound sequence or in some irrelevant feature of attended sounds (see Squires et al., 1975; Ford et al., 1976; Escera et al., 1998, 2001; Shestakova et al., 2002a; Wang et al., 2005b; for reviews, see Friedman et al., 2001; Ranganath and Rainer, 2003).”
Rapid discrimination of visual and multisensory memories revealed by electrical neuroimaging (2004, background): “For example, it has recently been proposed that memory is enhanced for contextually novel items relative to less distinct experiences (e.g., Ranganath and Rainer, 2003).”
Intrinsic motivations and open-ended development in animals, humans, and robots: an overview (2014, background): “The authors demonstrate the function and effectiveness of this paradigm by presenting behavioral experiments grounded in the neuroscientiﬁc literature and concerning the acquisition of non-trivial motor actions.”
GRAIL: A Goal-Discovering Robotic Architecture for Intrinsically-Motivated Learning (2016, background): “research in the field of neuroscience [26], [64], [65], [95] has highlighted some of the neural mechanisms that seem to be involved in IM processes.”
Evolutionary and Computational Advantages of Neuromodulated Plasticity (2008, background): “This finding brought the focus on the role of unexpectedness as a driving mechanism for learning in changing environments (Brown et al., 1999; Ranganath and Rainer, 2003; Dayan and Yu, 2006; Redgrave et al., 2008).”
The brain uses single-trial multisensory memories to discriminate without awareness (2005, neutral): “An account of the present results in terms of selective attention to audition or novel context detection (e.g., Ranganath and Rainer, 2003 ) can thus be discounted, as these would have predicted faster and/or more accurate performance on initial multisensory presentations because of the fact that…”
Arousal-biased competition in perception and memory (2011, neutral): “For instance, novel and unexpected stimuli are prioritized due to the mismatch between perceptual input and prior knowledge (Itti & Baldi, 2009; Ranganath & Rainer, 2003).”
The efficacy of single-trial multisensory memories. (2013, background): “One possibility is that these effects are the consequence of selective attention to the auditory channel and/or novel contexts (e.g. Tsivilis et al., 2001; Ranganath and Rainer, 2003).”
A systems approach to appraisal mechanisms in emotion (2005, neutral): “…Naeaetaenen, & Gaillard, 1983; Rohrbaugh, 1984), as being different from the component N2–P3 related to a target stimulus, which presents a posterior distribution on the scalp and a longer latency (Picton, Champagne, & Kellet, 1992; Ranganath, & Rainer, 2003; Squires, Squires, & Hillyard, 1975).”
Dissociable correlates of recollection and familiarity within the medial temporal lobes. (2004, background): “…in enhancing synaptic plasticity (Gu, 2002) and memory consolidation (Hasselmo, 1999), we have hypothesized that an orbitofrontal-rhinal circuit may act to modulate the encoding of items based on their relative novelty or distinctiveness (Kishiyama & Yonelinas, in press; Ranganath & Rainer, 2003).”