Rapid discrimination of visual and multisensory memories revealed by electrical neuroimaging

By Micah M. Murray, C. Michel, R. D. Peralta, S. Ortigue, Denis Brunet, Sara González Andino, A. Schnider. 2004

250 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The role of multisensory memories in unisensory object discrimination. (2005, result): “We discuss these results as supporting a model of objectbased multisensory interactions.”
Multisensory integration: flexible use of general operations (2014, unknown): “…correlates of these effects indicate that incoming unisensory information is rapidly processed by distinct brain networks according to the prior multisensory versus unisensory context in which an object was initially encountered (Murray et al., 2004; Thelen et al., 2012; Thelen and Murray, 2013).”
Topographic ERP Analyses: A Step-by-Step Tutorial Review (2008, background): “[6, 7, 42, 44, 54, 63, 71], see also [29]), though we would immediately remind the reader that no analysis of variance is being conducted.”
The brain uses single-trial multisensory memories to discriminate without awareness (2005, unknown): “In Murray et al. (2004b), differences in the electric field at the scalp were statistically identified beginning at 60 ms post-stimulus, which forcibly result from changes in the configuration of intracranial generators (see e.g., Murray et al., 2004a,b for discussion).”
Electrical neuroimaging of memory discrimination based on single-trial multisensory learning (2012, methodology): “On the other hand, prior brain imaging data would suggest that differential responses to incoming visual stimuli can manifest as early as ~100 ms post-stimulus onset and are indicative of the incidental discrimination of stored object representations according to past (semantic) multisensory experie”
The multisensory function of the human primary visual cortex. (2016, background): “…been shown to activate visual cortices as a function of prior multisensory experiences (Zangenehpour and Zatorre, 2010; Meylan and Murray, 2007; see also Murray et al. (2004, 2005), Thelen et al. (2012, 2014); Matusz et al. (2015a) for effects of prior multisensory contexts on sensory processing).”
Flexibility and Stability in Sensory Processing Revealed Using Visual-to-Auditory Sensory Substitution (2014, background): “…by testing the recognition of images which were initially viewed without accompanying sound, with an ecological accompanying sound (an image of a bell and a “dong” sound), and images accompanied by arbitrary meaningless sounds, without any training (Murray et al. 2004, 2005; Thelen et al. 2012).”
The role of auditory cortices in the retrieval of single‐trial auditory–visual object memories (2015, background): “context (Murray et al., 2004; Thelen et al., 2012), with no evidence for parallel effects within auditory cortices (e.”
Benefits of multisensory learning. (2008, result): “Nonetheless, these and other studies [ 56 ,57] suggest that multisensory exposure enables stimuli to be encoded”
EEG source imaging. (2004, methodology): “…2002), visuo-motor interactions (Thut et al., 1999, 2000a), language (Khateb et al., 2001, 2003; Ortigue et al., 2004), multisensory integration (Murray et al., 2004a,b), memory functions (Schnider et al., 2003) and for the definition of the primary ictal and interictal epileptic focus (Lantz…”