The role of multisensory memories in unisensory object discrimination.

By S. Lehmann, Micah M. Murray. 2005

203 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Sensory Systems

Citations in the corpus

Multisensory integration: flexible use of general operations (2014, unknown): “Recognition is enhanced if the initial multisensory experience had been semantically congruent and can be impaired if this multisensory pairing was either semantically incongruent or entailed meaningless information in the task-irrelevant modality, when compared to objects encountered exclusively in”
Electrical neuroimaging of memory discrimination based on single-trial multisensory learning (2012, result): “(Lehmann and Murray, 2005; Murray et al., 2004).”
What You See Is Not (Always) What You Hear: Induced Gamma Band Responses Reflect Cross-Modal Interactions in Familiar Object Recognition (2007, result): “Consistent with this notion, Lehmann and Murray (2005) showed that memory for object drawings was improved if the initial encounter with the drawing was accompanied by a congruent sound (relative to no sound at all) but not impaired if the initial encounter was accompanied by an incongruent sound.”
Single-trial multisensory memories affect later auditory and visual object discrimination. (2015, unknown): “Because we had a strong a priori hypothesis regarding the directionality of the effects due to previous investigations (Lehmann & Murray, 2005; Murray et al., 2004, 2005; Thelen et al., 2012) we applied one-tailed statistics to test for specific differences between multisensory pairings for the…”
Multisensory design: Reaching out to touch the consumer (2011, background): “The drive toward congruent multisensory stimulation is becoming all the more important given recent findings showing that it leads to better memory recall than does unimodal stimulation (e.g., Lehmann & Murray, 2005; see Gallace & Spence, 2009, for a review).”
Integrating Face and Voice in Person Perception (2013, unknown): “Patches of face-selective cortex in the macaque frontal lobe. Nature Neuroscience, 11 (8), 877–879. Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems.”
Act-In: An integrated view of memory mechanisms (2014, methodology): “Using the same paradigm as in 2004, Lehmann and Murray (2005) compared a condition in which the initial presentation of the picture was associated with a white noise (1000 Hz) and a condition in which the initial presentation was unimodal.”
Getting the point: Tracing worked examples enhances learning (2015, background): “It has been demonstrated that learning in an environment with input from multiple sensory modalities and with interactions between multisensory memories lead to better encoding and retrieving of information (e.g., Lehmann & Murray, 2005; Nyberg, Habib, McIntosh, & Tulving, 2000).”
The efficacy of single-trial multisensory memories. (2013, background): “On the one hand, Lehmann and Murray (2005) examined the role of semantic congruence by dividing initial image presentations into three groups: those appearing only visually (50% of initial trials; V), those appearing as a semantically congruent auditoryvisual pair (25% of initial trials; AVc), and…”