The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review.

By Risto Näätänen, Petri Paavilainen, Teemu Rinne, Kimmo Alho. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2007

2,611 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Signal Processing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2cc16fd610cb4029b3224f0f86cee3faede9d100

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Signal Processing

Citations in the corpus

Event-related potentials in clinical research: guidelines for eliciting, recording, and quantifying mismatch negativity, P300, and N400. (2009, background): “The mismatch negativity (MMN; Näätänen et al., 1978; for reviews, see Näätänen and Winkler, 1999; Näätänen et al., 2007) and its magnetoencephalographic equivalent, MMNm, are elicited by any discriminable change in auditory stimulation.”
Towards the utilization of EEG as a brain imaging tool (2012, background): “One striking example is the mismatch negativity (MMN) (comprehensively reviewed by Deouell, 2007; Naatanen et al., 2007).”
Using EEG to Predict Consumers’ Future Choices (2015, background): “The N2a, also termed the “mismatch negativity potential,” is mainly localized in the frontocentral areas of the scalp and is typically elicited in response to an unpredictable, low-probability, auditory stimulus in a sequence of stimuli (Naatanen et al. 2007).”
A Hierarchy of Responses to Auditory Regularities in the Macaque Brain (2014, neutral): “There is debate as to whether the MMN can be explained exclusively by a passive process of SSA (May and Tiitinen, 2010) or denotes an active predictive-coding mechanism (Czigler et al., 2007; Näätänen et al., 2007; Wacongne et al., 2012).”
Repetition Suppression and Expectation Suppression Are Dissociable in Time in Early Auditory Evoked Fields (2012, background): “A large body of literature has documented that when an unexpected deviant sound is introduced within a sequence of repeated frequent sounds, larger neural activity is observed within this time window: the MMN (Näätänen et al., 2007).”
The mismatch negativity: A review of underlying mechanisms (2009, background): “While the MMN has been studied intensively in the auditory modality (for a recent review see Näätänen et al., 2007), some studies show evidence for the existence of a visual MMN counterpart (Astikainen et al., 2004; Czigler et al., 2004; see Pazo-Alvarez et al., 2003, for review).”
A Neuronal Model of Predictive Coding Accounting for the Mismatch Negativity (2012, background): “The vast literature on the MMN describes a broad set of properties (for review, see Näätänen et al., 2007).”
Lost in thoughts: Neural markers of low alertness during mind wandering (2011, background): “For example, the negative brain response to the sensory detection of a sudden change in the flux of auditory perception called mismatch negativity (Naatanen, Paavilainen et al. 2007) is reduced during the early sleep stages and drowsiness (Lang, Eerola et al. 1995; Winter, Kok et al. 1995).”
The neural activity of auditory conscious perception (2025, unknown): “…are differentially encoded (Christison-Lagay and Cohen, 2018; Fishman et al., 2001; Micheyl et al., 2007, 2010, 2013), or how a target evokes different activity than its standards in an oddball paradigm (Gifford III et al., 2005; Javitt et al., 1994; Näatänen et al., 2007; Yabe et al., 1997).”
Theta activity and cognitive functioning: Integrating evidence from resting-state and task-related developmental electroencephalography (EEG) research (2024, background): “Neural responses during this paradigm are thought to reflect change/novelty detection and attention orienting (Escera et al., 1998; N ¨ a ¨ at ¨ anen et al., 2007; Polich, 2007).”