The brain uses single-trial multisensory memories to discriminate without awareness
By Micah M. Murray, John J. Foxe, Glenn R. Wylie. 2005
97 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Micah M. Murray
- Pawel J. Matusz
- Antonia Thelen
- Vincenzo Romei
- Gregor Thut
- Nienke M. van Atteveldt
- Roberto Martuzzi
- Salvador Soto-Faraco
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Micah M. Murray
- Pawel J. Matusz
- Antonia Thelen
- Vincenzo Romei
- Gregor Thut
- Nienke M. van Atteveldt
- Roberto Martuzzi
- Salvador Soto-Faraco
In Sensory Systems
- Micah M. Murray
- Pawel J. Matusz
- Antonia Thelen
- Vincenzo Romei
- Gregor Thut
- Nienke M. van Atteveldt
- Roberto Martuzzi
- Mark T. Wallace
Citations in the corpus
- The COGs (context, object, and goals) in multisensory processing (2016, background): “, naturalistic unisensory objects (e.g. a dog) are categorised as repeated more 1 3 accurately if they are initially paired with congruent (e.g. a bark) stimuli in the other, irrelevant sense (Murray et al. 2004, 2005; Matusz et al. 2015a; Thelen et al. 2015).”
- Single-trial multisensory memories affect later auditory and visual object discrimination. (2015, unknown): “Because we had a strong a priori hypothesis regarding the directionality of the effects due to previous investigations (Lehmann & Murray, 2005; Murray et al., 2004, 2005; Thelen et al., 2012) we applied one-tailed statistics to test for specific differences between multisensory pairings for the…”
- Multisensory integration: flexible use of general operations (2014, unknown): “…multisensory pairing was either semantically incongruent or entailed meaningless information in the task-irrelevant modality, when compared to objects encountered exclusively in a unisensory context (Lehmann and Murray, 2005; Murray et al., 2004, 2005; Thelen et al., 2012; Thelen and Murray, 2013).”
- The efficacy of single-trial multisensory memories. (2013, methodology): “…36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 Thelen & Murray 29 (2004) and Thelen et al. (2012) during the earliest period of event-related potential differences as well as the results of statistical contrasts in the fMRI study of Murray et al. (2005).”
- The multisensory function of the human primary visual cortex. (2016, background): “…been shown to activate visual cortices as a function of prior multisensory experiences (Zangenehpour and Zatorre, 2010; Meylan and Murray, 2007; see also Murray et al. (2004, 2005), Thelen et al. (2012, 2014); Matusz et al. (2015a) for effects of prior multisensory contexts on sensory processing).”