A revised model of short-term memory and long-term learning of verbal sequences

304 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Design for a working memory. (2009, result): “This and other findings (Hitch, Fastame, & Flude, 2005) have led Burgess and Hitch (2006) to revise their earlier account of the Hebb effect in terms of itemposition associations.”
The mind and brain of short-term memory. (2008, methodology): “The Burgess & Hitch (2005, 2006) connectionist model, the ExecutiveProcess/Interactive Control (EPIC) symbolic model (Meyer and Kieras 1997), and the Atomic Components of Thought (ACT-R) hybrid model (Anderson & Matessa 1997) all assume that rehearsal in verbal STM consists of a controlled sequence…”
Neural Evidence for a Distinction Between Short-Term Memory and the Focus of Attention (2011, unknown): “…can be reactivated during short-delay tests of STM is anticipated in neuralnetwork models of serial order recall (Botvinick & Plaut, 2006; Burgess & Hitch, 2006; Farrell & Lewandowsky, 2002; Burgess & Hitch, 1999) and in retrieved context models of memory search (Polyn et al., 2009;…”
An Interference Model of Visual Working Memory (2017, methodology): “…effort is the family of 2-layer neural network models that has been used with much success in the literature on (working) memory for lists (Brown, Preece, & Hulme, 2000; Burgess & Hitch, 2006; Lewandowsky & Farrell, 2008; Oberauer, Lewandowsky, et al., 2012; Sederberg, Howard, & Kahana, 2008).”