A temporal–contextual retrieval account of complex span: An analysis of errors
By Nash Unsworth, R. Engle. 2006
88 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/043b4174647990745d1752da1828c187e9f2d386
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Nash Unsworth
- R. Engle
- Klaus Oberauer
- Oliver Wilhelm
- Werner W. Wittmann
- Heinz-Martin Süβ
- Zach Shipstead
- Scott Barry Kaufman
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- R. Engle
- Nash Unsworth
- Klaus Oberauer
- Oliver Wilhelm
- Zach Shipstead
- Adam Chuderski
- Robyn L. Marshall
- Dakota R. B. Lindsey
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Klaus Oberauer
- R. Engle
- Nash Unsworth
- Oliver Wilhelm
- Zach Shipstead
- Adam Chuderski
- Heinz-Martin Süβ
- Werner W. Wittmann
Citations in the corpus
- On the division of short-term and working memory: an examination of simple and complex span and their relation to higher order abilities. (2007, methodology): “If, as argued previously, variability from these long lists is important in predicting performance on higher order cognitive tasks (see Unsworth & Engle, 2006a), then using the ABS method likely reduced the amount of variability from these list lengths and attenuated the correlations.”
- Which Working Memory Functions Predict Intelligence (2008, background): “One insight emerging clearly from a careful analysis of errors on the complex span task is that it involves setting up temporary bindings between memory list items and representations of their serial positions (Unsworth & Engle, 2006).”
- The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. (2007, methodology): “…Glenberg, Bradley, Stevenson, Kraus, & Renzaglia, 1983; Glenberg et al., 1980, Lee & Estes, 1981), we assume that several different contextual elements are associated with each item at encoding and that these different contextual elements change at different rates (e.g., Unsworth & Engle, 2006a).”
- Handbook of individual differences in cognition : attention, memory, and executive control (2010, unknown): “W. (2006).”
- The mechanisms of working memory capacity: Primary memory, secondary memory, and attention control (2014, background): “That is, when time-based cuing (e.g. Unsworth & Engle, 2006 ) of memory is made difficult, less information can be recalled into immediate awareness.”