A temporal ratio model of memory.
By Gordon D. A. Brown, Ian Neath, N. Chater. Psychology Review, 2007
777 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/00e9e3984599b9ab357ac69af4f1a47fd23112f1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Klaus Oberauer
- Zach Shipstead
- R. Engle
- Stephan Lewandowsky
- Ullrich K. H. Ecker
- Hsuan-Yu Lin
- N. Chater
- Robyn L. Marshall
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Devi Parikh
- Luc Van Gool
- Trevor Darrell
- Dacheng Tao
- Mohit Bansal
- C. Lawrence Zitnick
- Xiaogang Wang
- Cordelia Schmid
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Hsuan-Yu Lin
- N. Chater
- Zach Shipstead
- Morten H. Christiansen
- Stephan Lewandowsky
- Ullrich K. H. Ecker
- R. Engle
- Robyn L. Marshall
Citations in the corpus
- Working Memory Underpins Cognitive Development, Learning, and Education (2013, neutral): “For examples of such models, see Brown et al. (2007), Burgess and Hitch (1999), Cowan et al. (2012), Farrell and Lewandowsky (2002), Henson (1998), Murdock (1983), and Oberauer and Lewandowsky (2011).”
- The mechanisms of working memory capacity: Primary memory, secondary memory, and attention control (2014, methodology): “In contrast to strict maintenance-related perspectives of working memory capacity (e.g., Colom, Abad, Quiroga, Shih, & Flores-Mendoza, 2008), the executive attention account (Engle, 2002) equates working memory capacity with the ability to use attention to select relevant information from the enviro”
- He did it! She did it! No, she did not! Multiple causal explanations and the continued influence of misinformation (2015, background): “Jones & Oberauer, 2013); they may occur because initial information receives more rehearsal (Tan & Ward, 2008), more attention at encoding (Farrell & Lewandowsky, 2002; Page & Norris, 1998), or because initial information is more distinct in the absence of proactively interfering information (Brown ”
- Consequences of the Now-or-Never bottleneck for signed versus spoken languages (2015, background): “…by the local nature of phonological processes from reduction, assimilation, and fronting, including more elaborate phenomena such as vowel harmony (e.g., Nevins 2010), speech errors (e.g., Cutler 1982), the immediate proximity of inflectional morphemes and the verbs to which they apply, and…”
- Adopting Abstract Images for Semantic Scene Understanding (2016, methodology): “A discussion of different models of memory retrieval [46], [47], [48] and formation [49] are beyond the scope of this paper.”
- A context maintenance and retrieval model of organizational processes in free recall (2009, neutral): “, Brown et al., 2007) but, rather, in the sense of positional lag between items in the study list. At the suggestion of a reviewer, we examined more closely the pattern of temporal clustering for early and later output positions, for both near and distant lags. Recently, Farrell and Lewandowsky (200”
- An Interference Model of Visual Working Memory (2017, background): “Proactive interference arises naturally in models that assign temporal context an important role for cueing retrieval of specific events (Brown et al., 2007).”
- Does Wage Rank Affect Employees' Wellbeing? (2008, neutral): “Ordoñez, Connolly, and Coughlan (2000) presented evidence that the judged fairness of a salary level was determined by comparisons to more than one referent (cf also Highhouse et al. 2003; Seidl, Traub, and Morone 2003). Mellers (1982) examined how individuals chose to achieve fairness when they wer”