Invited Commentary: Interpreting failed replications of early false-belief findings: Methodological and theoretical considerations

103 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Do infants understand false beliefs? We don’t know yet – A commentary on Baillargeon, Buttelmann and Southgate’s commentary (2018, background): “For instance, intention action can be understood as action for a good reason (Anscombe, 1957; Perner & Roessler, 2010) and knowledge can be understood as a relation between the agent and the event of which”