A Tangled Web of Terms: The Overlap and Unique Contribution of Involvement, Engagement, and Integration to Understanding College Student Success

By Lisa E. Wolf-Wendel, K. Ward, Jillian Kinzie. 2009

471 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a3667170be487e5e76790e8dcc57a67d836e6754

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

Citations in the corpus

Academic Engagement and Intention to Drop Out: Levers for Sustainability in Higher Education (2018, background): “Starting from Tinto’s theory of integration and building upon Astin’s theory of involvement—defined as being the manifested “investment of psychological and physical energy, which occurs along a continuum, with different students investing different amounts of energy” [11] (p.”
The Unwritten Rules of Engagement: Social Class Differences in Undergraduates' Academic Strategies (2016, background): “Because the field of higher education defines the “rules of engagement” as interactive learning behaviors (Wolf-Wendel et al., 2009), the engagement strategies of middle class students are recognized and rewarded, at the same time that the independent engagement strategies of first-generation…”
Student retention and engagement in higher education (2020, background): “Wolf-Wendel, Ward, and Kinzie (2009) link the idea of engagement to the related terms involvement and integration.”
What Student Affairs Professionals Need to Know About Student Engagement (2009, background): “(cited in Wolf-Wendel et al., 2009) November/December 2009 ◆ vol 50 No 6 695 What is the cost of Demonstrably effective educational practices relative to other approaches?”
A Sense of Belonging: Improving Student Retention. (2013, background): “While this paper contends that the creation of a caring environment where students are well supported and have access to counselling is important for student retention, others argue that the onus is on the student to adjust to the expectations of the higher education institution (Collier and Morgan ”