Speculations on qualities of difficult knowledge in teaching and learning: an experiment in psychoanalytic research
By A. Pitt, Deborah P. Britzman. 2003
388 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Human Factors and Ergonomics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a1e82839a7e6957a88c0f61dec3c9b4da7392adc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- H. James Garrett
- Michalinos Zembylas
- A. Segall
- Icy Lee
- Rui (Eric) Yuan
- R. Saunders
- Hongbiao Yin
- N. Lesko
In Human Factors and Ergonomics
Citations in the corpus
- Theorizing “Difficult Knowledge” in the Aftermath of the “Affective Turn”: Implications for Curriculum and Pedagogy in Handling Traumatic Representations (2014, background): “Taylor raises a number of provocative questions about difficult knowledge (pp. 27–28) that push forward the ones posited by Pitt and Britzman (2003) and recognize the strong interrelations between psychic elements and social discourses.”
- (Re)Considerations of Ignorance and Resistance in Teacher Education (2013, background): “What we have suggested is that ignorance is inherently active and that resistance is not simply a form of refusing knowledge but is part and parcel of learning difficult knowledge (Britzman, 1998; Pitt & Britzman, 2003).”