The Impact of CEO Characteristics on Corporate Social Performance

By Mikko H. Manner. 2010

504 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9ea60c3303bde2a5c575283d1bc2c95455f0129c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Marketing

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

The Impact of CEO Characteristics on Corporate Sustainable Development (2013, methodology): “There is a lack of investigation into relevant managerial variables affecting CSR performance (Waldman et al., 2006a, 2006b; Angus-Leppan et al., 2010; Manner, 2010).”
Comprehensive Board Diversity and Quality of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from an Emerging Market (2017, background): “…be comprised of members from different disciplines including accounting, ﬁnance, marketing, information systems, engineering, humanity, legal issues and other related areas that inﬂuence the decision-making process (Vo and Phan 2013; Manner 2010; Barker and Mueller 2002; Krishnan et al. (2011)).”
The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Investment Recommendations: Analysts’ Perceptions and Shifting Institutional Logics (2015, methodology): “Whereas few prior articles have constructed a single CSR score by subtracting total concerns from total strengths (e.g. Slater & Dixon-Fowler, 2009; Manner, 2010), we do not adopt this approach in our empirical analysis because the theoretical rationale that we developed pertains specifically to…”
How CEO hubris affects corporate social (Ir)responsibility (2015, unknown): “compensation affect CSR (Deckop et al., 2006; Manner, 2010).”
THE IMPACT OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY ON INVESTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS. (2010, methodology): “Whereas few prior articles have constructed a single CSR score by subtracting total concerns from total strengths (e.g. Slater & Dixon-Fowler, 2009; Manner, 2010), we do not adopt this approach in our empirical analysis because the theoretical rationale that we developed pertains specifically to…”
Foreign experience and CEO compensation (2018, background): “…previous studies suggest negative binominal and Poisson models as alternative approaches (Cameron and Trivedi, 1998).12 The advantage of negative binominal and Poisson models compare to OLS is that they will not provide negative predicted values for CEO total compensation (Manner, 2010).”
Doing Good Business by Hiring Directors with Foreign Experience (2016, background): “Lawrence (1969) and Manner (2010) have suggested that theoretically, human beings resist changing their thinking patterns and behavior.”
Corporate social responsibility and CEO confidence (2017, unknown): “This is in contrast to the existing literature regarding female CEOs and CSR (Manner, 2010; Marquis and Lee, 2013 and Zhang et al., 2013).”
The Role of CEO’s Personal Incentives in Driving Corporate Social Responsibility (2014, background): “We believe that these results are particularly relevant because CEOs are recognized to have extensive decision-making power and the ability to affect the social responsibility of a firm (Deckop et al. 2006; Kochan, 2002; Manner, 2010; Waldman et al., 2006).”
Corporate Social Performance: A Review of Empirical Research Examining the Corporation–Society Relationship Using Kinder, Lydenberg, Domini Social Ratings Data (2017, background): “A final study examining CEO effects demonstrated that CSP strengths were positively related to the CEO having a humanities degree, breadth of stakeholder experience, and being female, but negatively related to the CEO having a degree in economics (Manner, 2010).”