Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading.

By John C. J. Hoeks, Laurie A. Stowe, Gina Doedens. Brain research. Cognitive brain research, 2004

375 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9e5ecab5c18a363de522d195d388d4afd0446ddf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function. (2011, background): “Different explanations were put forward for “semantic P600” effects: 1) plausibility/semantic attraction between the verb and an argument (139), 2) thematic processing cost (120), and 3) interaction of thematic and semantic memory (149).”
Prediction during language comprehension: benefits, costs, and ERP components. (2012, result): “The discrepancy between contextual constraint and cloze probability has intuitive appeal for quantifying the strength with which a prediction is disconfirmed, so that this idea has been applied in many other papers, including one from our lab (Federmeier, 2007; Federmeier et al., 2002, 2007; Hoeks e”
Second language processing: when are first and second languages processed similarly? (2008, background): “There is also some indication that the P600 effects found in sentence processing may not reflect syntactic processing per se but should be regarded more as indexing strategically controlled processes, such as attempting to reconstruct meaning from an ungrammatical or incoherent sentence (Gunter and ”
The linguistic processes underlying the P600 (2010, background): “, 2005) or to the detection of an anomaly in thematic role assignment (Hoeks et al., 2004; Stroud, 2008), or to both of these factors (Kuperberg, 2007).”
The status of subject-object reanalyses in the language comprehension architecture (2008, methodology): “with two or more degrees of freedom in the numerator were adjusted using the procedure suggested by Huynh and Feldt (1970). All analyses were carried out in a hierarchical manner in that only significant interactions (p < .”
Getting real about semantic illusions: rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension. (2012, background): “However, this makes it unclear how the Continued Combinatory Analysis (CCA) account could explain the biphasic N400/ P600-effect found by Hoeks et al. (2004) in sentences such as ‘De speer heeft de atleten opgesomd’ (lit: The javelin has the athletes summarized) relative to ‘De speer werd door de…”
An alternative perspective on "semantic P600" effects in language comprehension. (2008, neutral): “Reference transfer can be understood as part of a larger class of linguistic phenomena requiring enriched composition, i.e. additional inferential processes that are necessary for the computation of an implied meaning (see, for example, Jackendoff, 1997; Pustejovsky, 1995).”
The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials (2005, background): “Kolk et al. (2003) and Kuperberg et al. (2003) both reported P600 effects to verbs that were seemingly semantically anomalous (e.g., The eggs would eat .. .) (see also Hoeks, Stowe, & Doedens, 2004 ).”
Chapter 1 Time for Meaning: Electrophysiology Provides Insights into the Dynamics of Representation and Processing in Semantic Memory (2009, background): “1 are not associated with larger N400 responses, they do elicit enhanced posterior positivities (Hoeks et al., 2004; Kuperberg et al., 2003, 2007).”
Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: challenges to syntax. (2007, methodology): “Interestingly, unlike the non-associated semantic verb-argument violations presented by Hoeks et al. (2004) and Friederici and Frisch (2000) that evoked fairly robust N400 effects in addition to P600 effects, the non-associated semantic verb-argument violations in this study only evoked a very…”