The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function.

By Angela D. Friederici. Physiological Reviews, 2011

1,765 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7c53b0aa09151ecf6db41ae4aa101eafb44f0a3f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Getting real about semantic illusions: rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension. (2012, background): “…account can be extended to include other ERPeffects that have been found in language processing studies, such as the Early Left Anterior Negativity (ELAN), the Left Anterior Negativity (LAN), as well as Sustained Negativities (see Friederici, 2011; Steinhauer andDrury, 2011, for critical reviews).”
Neurobiology of language (2016, background): “Although some hypotheses have been proposed (Friederici, 2011), no studies have yet been conducted that distinguish behavioral performance of patients based on some operational measure of the purported functional deficit.”
Speech Rhythms and Multiplexed Oscillatory Sensory Coding in the Human Brain (2013, result): “These results are consistent with previous findings that right temporal and frontal brain areas are involved in prosodic processing [24,39].”
Syntax (2014, background): “46,47 That is, constituent structure is independent of the order of the elements in that structure, so the two trees in (10) are equivalent ways of representing the same constituent:”
Interpreting and improving natural-language processing (in machines) with natural language-processing (in the brain) (2019, background): “These conditions typically vary in complexity (simple vs. complex sentences), vary in the presence or absence of a linguistic property (sentences vs. lists of words) or vary in the presence or absence of incongruities (e.g. semantic surprisal) (Friederici, 2011).”
Impact of Working Memory Constraints on Speech Monitoring in Healthy Children (2013, background): “the later positivity may reflect the reformulation required to make a repair to the syntax (Friederici et al., 2002). Makuuchi, Bahlmann, Anwander and Friederici (2009) found”
The Bilingual Adaptation: How Minds Accommodate Experience (2017, background): “Finally, language use is integrative; using language engages most of the brain, including frontal, temporal, and parietal lobes, as well as some posterior regions (Friederici, 2011). This extensive involvement of brain centers increases the possibility that experience-related effects found for langu”
Aperiodic Dynamics of Cell Assemblies Recruited for L1 and L2 Processing of French Wh-Dependencies Highlight a Temporo-Parietal Engagement in Syntax (2026, unknown): “According to Friederici [34,46,47], the implementation of basic syntax resides in the left-hemisphere posterior inferior frontal gyrus (pIFG), with the temporo-parietal cortex supporting the processing of complex structures (see also [36]).”
Age and vocabulary knowledge differentially influence the N400 and theta responses during semantic retrieval (2023, background): “This region is particularly important for semantic processing (for review, see Binder and Desai, 2011; Friederici, 2011), as a meta-analysis of 120 neuroimaging studies revealed the middle temporal gyrus and posterior inferior parietal lobe were shown to play a role in semantic integration and the…”