The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials

By Albert E. Kim, Lee Osterhout. 2005

289 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/090990dd97e664426f4e4c8873288f14d7dc6476

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function. (2011, background): “Different explanations were put forward for “semantic P600” effects: 1) plausibility/semantic attraction between the verb and an argument (139), 2) thematic processing cost (120), and 3) interaction of thematic and semantic memory (149).”
Processing wh-dependencies in a second language: a cross-modal priming study (2007, background): “Evidence from ERPs suggests that strongly plausible predicate–argument combinations may lead the parser to pursue an incorrect syntactic analysis (Kim and Osterhout, 2005), and native speakers’ misinterpretations of certain types of garden-path sentence indicate that thematic roles once assigned ten”
Brain Potentials Reveal Discrete Stages of L2 Grammatical Learning (2010, background): “…are numerous studies of grammatical processing that have failed to show LAN effects in native speakers (e.g., Ainsworth-Darnell et al., 1998; Frenck-Mestre et al., 2008, 2009; Hagoort et al., 1993; Kim & Osterhout, 2005; McKinnon & Osterhout, 1996; Osterhout & Mobley, 1995; Sabourin & Stowe, 2008).”
Semantics and the electrophysiology of meaning: Tense, aspect, event structure (2004, background): “For instance, let us consider one of the first ERP studies on syntactic constraint violations, by Osterhout and Holcomb [151].”
Prediction during language comprehension: benefits, costs, and ERP components. (2012, background): “…in thematically implausible ways, such as " The hearty meal was DEVOURING the kids " , " For breakfast, the eggs would only EAT toast and jam " , and " The cat that from the mouse FLED ran through the room " (Kim and Osterhout, 2005; Kuperberg et al., 2003; van Herten et al., 2005, respectively ).”
The status of subject-object reanalyses in the language comprehension architecture (2008, background): “The hearty meal was devouring . . ., from Kim & Osterhout, 2005) or structures inducing an animacy mismatch between the subject and the verb.”
Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: challenges to syntax. (2007, methodology): “…et al., 2006a and Kuperberg et al., 2007b Every morning at breakfast the eggs would eat… Every morning at breakfast the eggs would be eaten… Kim and Osterhout, 2005 Experiment 1 The hearty meal was devouring… The hearty meal was devoured… Kolk et al., 2003 De kat die voor de muizen…”
Novice Learners, Longitudinal Designs, and Event-Related Potentials: A Means for Exploring the Neurocognition of Second Language Processing. (2006, background): “2 Another problematic aspect of using the LAN effect to study L2 processing is that there are a significant number of reports involving native speakers in which they are not reported (e.g., Ainsworth-Darnell, Shulman, & Boland, 1998; Allen et al., 2003; Hagoort, Brown, & Groothusen, 1993; Kim & Ost”
The extended argument dependency model: a neurocognitive approach to sentence comprehension across languages. (2006, background): “…Phase 3 are reflected in late positive effects, the fine-grained differences between the distinct processing steps assumed within this phase and 7 Kim and Osterhout (2005) also observed a (seemingly monophasic) late positivity in response to a semantic incongruency (e.g., in The hearty meal was…”
The logic of syntactic priming and acceptability judgments (2016, unknown): “…signatures for implausible versus ungrammatical sentences (e.g., Kutas and Hillyard 1980; Osterhout and Holcomb 1992), but it is unclear whether there is a specifically semantic or syntactic component in the ERP wave-form (e.g., Kim and Osterhout 2005; Nieuwland, Martin, and Carreiras 2013).”