Critical Literacy in Australia: A Matter of Context and Standpoint.

By A. Luke. 2000

541 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9db5731e4d297cf75bb65fa09ba7df9dca42c128

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Daniel K. Siebert
2. Urvashi Sahni
3. Glynda Hull
4. Roni Jo Draper
5. A. Stornaiuolo
6. Joanne Lobato
7. Amy B. Ellis
8. F. Marton

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Urvashi Sahni
2. A. Stornaiuolo
3. Daniel K. Siebert
4. Glynda Hull
5. Roni Jo Draper

Citations in the corpus

• Cultural Citizenship and Cosmopolitan Practice: Global Youth Communicate Online (2010, background): “As with other like-minded pedagogies that also foster questioning stances toward dominant discourses (Janks, 2000; Lewis, Enciso, & Moje, 2007; Luke, 2000; Shor, 1999), Prayas’ critical dialogues were intended to empower the young women to consider and address the inequities in their lives.”
• Different Goals, Similar Practices: Making Sense of the Mathematics and Literacy Instruction in aStandards -Based Mathematics Classroom (2004, background): “…we both viewed learning as a constructive, meaningmaking process that occurs as an interaction between the learner and the cultural, societal, and political context in which the learner is situated (Cole, 1990; Luke, 2000; Moje et al., 2000; O’Brien, Stewart, & Moje, 1995; Vygotsky, 1978).”