Sensory interpretation of instrumental measurements 1: texture of apple fruit

By F. Harker, J. Maindonald, S. Murray, F. A. Gunson, I. Hallett, S. B. Walker. 2002

302 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9da75afba5951135d583e0a58841932ff247d013

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Food Science

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Md-ACS1 and Md-ACO1 genotyping of apple (Malus x domestica Borkh.) breeding parents and suitability for marker-assisted selection (2008, background): “Fruit softening is an irreversible process of senescence and excessive softening of apple is undesirable because it results in short shelf life and lower sensory values (Abbott et al. 1984; Harker et al. 1997, Harker et al. 2002; Jaeger et al. 1998).”
Phenotypic diversity and relationships of fruit quality traits in peach and nectarine [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] breeding progenies (2009, background): “Crisosto et al. (1997) reported a closer relationship of RI with eating quality than that of TA or SSC individually, and Harker et al. (2002) reported that RI was the best predictor of apple flavour.”
Prediction of the sensory quality of apples by physical measurements (2004, background): “This is in accordance with the findings of Harker et al. (2002), who reported that penetrometric measurements are good predictors of sensory attributes such as firmness, crunchiness and crispness.”
Textural properties of different melon (Cucumis melo L.) fruit types: Sensory and physical-chemical evaluation (2016, result): “Similar trends have been observed in previous texture studies of fruit (Harker et al., 2002; Gunness et al., 2009; Chauvin et al., 2010) and other foodstuffs (Meullenet et al., 1998; Drake and Gerard 1999; Guerrero et al., 1999).”
Assessment of apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) fruit texture by a combined acoustic-mechanical profiling strategy (2011, methodology): “The use of the puncture test to predict consumer preference has been also reviewed and questioned (Harker et al., 2002).”
Postharvest assessment of fruit quality parameters in apple using both instruments and an expert panel (2009, methodology): “For example, generic forms of QDA ave been used to establish sensory–instrumental relationships for exture and taste of apples (Harker et al., 2002a,b) and to help dentify flavor and texture attributes that may be targets for apple reeding programs (MacFie and Beyts, 1995; Daillant-Spinnler et l.,…”
Effects of the sound of the bite on apple perceived crispness and hardness (2014, background): “Crispness would refer to some sound characteristics of the noise produced by the apple when it is bitten with the front teeth (Harker et al., 2002), as well as to the vibrations produced by the apple when it breaks (Christensen & Vickers, 1981; Szczesniak, 1988), and to the strength needed to obtain”
Estimation of genetic parameters and prediction of breeding values for apple fruit-quality traits using pedigreed plant material in Europe (2009, background): “These results are in agreement with those of Watada et al. (1981) and Harker et al. (2002b).”