Ecosystems, contingent valuation and ethics: the case of wetland re-creation

By C. Spash. 2000

240 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9d995786e1840918d324ec4441e21d5a6efadbcf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Citations in the corpus

Environmental Valuation Analysis, Public Deliberation, and their Pragmatic Syntheses: A Critical Appraisal (2001, background): “Preferences which deny trade-offs (for example, lexicographic preferences) require serious attention and motives to act can include social altruism and biospheric orientations (Spash, 2000a).”
The Brave New World of Carbon Trading (2009, background): “as evident in contingent valuation studies ( Spash, 2000a; 2006 ).”
Multifunctionality of Agriculture:A Review of Definitions, Evidence and Instruments (2007, background): “Although often criticised (Kahneman and Knetsch, 1992; Jacobs, 1997; Spash, 2000, 2002; Kumar and Kumar, 2004; Zhang and Li, 2005; Howarth and Wilson, 2006) the social valuation method results are often the only ones existing.”
The Environment as a Commodity (2000, unknown): “This is exactly what is observed in the work of Spash on lexicographic preferences (Spash 1998; 2000).”
Deliberative Monetary Valuation and the Evidence for a New Value Theory (2008, methodology): “One part of that project was the exploration of citizens’ juries (Aldred and Jacobs 1997, 2000) and the simultaneous evaluation of the same environmental change using the CVM (Spash 1998, 2000), in order to provide cross-comparison (O’Neill and Spash 1998, 2000).”
Incorporating Discontinuous Preferences into the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments (2008, background): “…non-compensatory behaviour because no matter how much an attribute level is improved—if the attribute itself is ignored by the respondent—then such improvement will fail to compensate for worsening in the levels of other attributes (Spash, 2000; Rekola, 2003; Sælensminde, 2002; Lockwood, 1996).”
In markets we trust? Setting the boundaries of Market-Based Instruments in ecosystem services governance (2015, background): “…concerns on the extension of market values into aspects of the environment that have been traditionally protected on the basis of their intrinsic value (McCauley, 2006), often stressing problems about incommensurability of values (Martínez-Alier, 2002) and refusals to make trade-offs (Spash, 2000).”
Non-trading, lexicographic and inconsistent behaviour in stated choice data (2010, background): “…where over the course of the experiment, a respondent evaluates the alternatives on the basis of a subset of attributes (see e.g., Blume et al. 2006; Campbell et al. 2006; Deshazo and Fermo 2002; Foster and Mourato 2002; Rekola 2003; Rosenberger et al. 2003; Sælensminde 2001, 2002; Spash 2000).”
Motives behind willingness to pay for improving biodiversity in a water ecosystem: Economics, ethics and social psychology (2009, methodology): “In terms of the relative strengths of the tworights basedpositions this sampleshowsmorepeople maintaining a strong rights position than found in previous work (see Spash, 2000b).”
Motivation crowding by economic incentives in conservation policy: A review of the empirical evidence (2015, background): “For instance, the potential of survey measures of non-anthropocentric motives for biodiversity conservation (e.g. Spash, 2000; Butler and Acott, 2007; Spash et al., 2009; Martín-Lopez et al., 2008), psychological scales of environmental values and attitudes (e.g. Gagnon Thompson and Barton, 1994;…”