Environmental Valuation Analysis, Public Deliberation, and their Pragmatic Syntheses: A Critical Appraisal

By S. Niemeyer, C. Spash. 2001

146 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b3b28f64fdab3d2dfe7d2dc77a2b8d70078cd423

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. J. Kenter
2. I. Fazey
3. Alex Y. Lo
4. Michael Christie
5. C. Spash
6. U. Pascual
7. A. Vatn
8. T. Hyde

In Global and Planetary Change

1. J. Kenter
2. I. Fazey
3. Michael Christie
4. Alex Y. Lo
5. C. Spash
6. A. Vatn
7. T. Hyde
8. U. Pascual

Citations in the corpus

• Cost-benefit analysis in the context of ecosystem services for human well-being: A multidisciplinary critique (2011, background): “Lexicographic preferences are preferences holding intrinsic value that makes them incommensurable with other preferences on a single scale of measurement (Niemeyer and Spash, 2001; O’Neill et al., 2008).”
• Transferring environmental value estimates: Issues and alternatives (2006, background): “There are several fundamental differences between political science and economic approaches and concerns have been raised over attempts to justify the latter by using elements of the former (Niemeyer and Spash, 2001).”
• Deliberative monetary valuation (DMV): Issues in combining economic and political processes to value environmental change (2007, background): “A rangeof papers have recently appeared on this topic (e.g., Gregory and Wellman, 2001; Niemeyer and Spash, 2001; Spash, 2001b; Macmillan et al., 2002, 2006; Wilson and Howarth, 2002; Aldred, 2005; James and Blamey, 2005; Howarth andWilson, 2006; Lienhoop and MacMillan, 2007) adding to earlier…”
• Deliberative Monetary Valuation: In Search of a Democratic and Value Plural Approach to Environmental Policy (2013, background): “…DMV follows on from this tradition by giving credence to legitimacy issues, civic engagement and social learning (Brown et al., 1995; Jacobs, 1997; Sagoff, 1998; Ward, 1999; Niemeyer and Spash, 2001; Wilson and Howarth, 2002; James and Blamey, 2005; Howarth and Wilson, 2006; Spash, 2007, 2008a).”
• An evaluation of monetary and non-monetary techniques for assessing the importance of biodiversity and ecosystem services to people in countries with developing economies (2012, unknown): “format, deliberation is used address issues of lowpublic knowledge of complex environmental goods (Alvarez-Farizo and Hanley, 2006), however, others argue for more fundamental changes to the social process used in valuation (Niemeyer and Spash, 2001; Sagoff, 1998; Spash, 2008).”
• The importance of deliberation in valuing ecosystem services in developing countries - evidence from the Solomon Islands (2011, background): “…of information and discussion to valuation has been expressed many times (Arrow et al., 1993; Hoehn and Randall, 2002; Macmillan et al., 2006; Niemeyer and Spash, 2001; Schiffman and Kanuk, 1991; Spash, 2002, 2007, 2008a; Urama and Hodge, 2006; Whilehead and Blomquist, 1991; Whittington,…”
• The Deliberative Value Formation model (2016, unknown): “Consequently, integrating deliberation into valuation can help participants better address rights, responsibilities, equity, fairness and other moral and political considerations as part of the value formation process (Niemeyer and Spash, 2001; O’Neill 2007; Orchard-Webb et al., 2016).”