In markets we trust? Setting the boundaries of Market-Based Instruments in ecosystem services governance
By E. Gómez‐Baggethun, R. Muradian. 2015
183 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b55388ab2307df9a74744b115a99df1d51ff2ab9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Kristjan Jespersen
- J. Dempsey
- M. Chapman
- R. Fletcher
- Daniel Suarez
- Emily K. Anderson
- Kai Ma Chan
- H. Wittmer
In Global and Planetary Change
- R. Fletcher
- Bram Büscher
- Kristjan Jespersen
- J. Dempsey
- M. Chapman
- Daniel Suarez
- Emily K. Anderson
- Kai Ma Chan
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
- R. Fletcher
- Kristjan Jespersen
- J. Dempsey
- M. Chapman
- Daniel Suarez
- Emily K. Anderson
- Kai Ma Chan
- K. Waylen
Citations in the corpus
- Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Cost-Benefit Analysis: Comparing alternative frameworks for integrated valuation of ecosystem services (2016, unknown): “…problematic in the presence of large income asymmetries, which can lead to an underestimation of ecosystem services that are essential to the wellbeing of less affluent groups such as indigenous people (Wegner and Pascual 2011; Sandel 2012; Pascual et al. 2014 ; Gómez-Baggethun and Muradian 2015).”
- Arrested Development? The Promises and Paradoxes of “Selling Nature to Save It” (2016, background): “…of PES a decade ago (Wunder 2005)—was forced recently (Wunder 2015) to “revisit his original proposition in the light of new available knowledge” and re-formulate a new definition for PES which included “its disassociation from a market-like scheme” (G omez-Baggethun and Muradian 2015, 220).”
- The science, policy and practice of nature-based solutions: An interdisciplinary perspective. (2017, background): “Many aspects of these questions also arisewhen using other existing concepts, see for example the controversies about the role and application of the ecosystem services concept (Fitter, 2013; Gómez-Baggethun and Muradian, 2015; Silvertown, 2015).”
- The PES Conceit: Revisiting the Relationship between Payments for Environmental Services and Neoliberal Conservation (2017, methodology): “In consideration of this discussion, Wunder (2015) recently revised his seminal PES definition to accommodate the approach's potential ‘disassociation from a market-like scheme’ (Gómez-Baggethun and Muradian 2015, 220).”
- In search of lost time: the rise and fall of limits to growth in international sustainability policy (2015, unknown): “Favored by their compatibility with dominant economic ideology, policy instruments based on market forces became privileged governance tools (Gómez-Baggethun and Muradian 2015).”
- Payments for Ecosystem Services: Rife With Problems and Potential—For Transformation Towards Sustainability (2017, background): “Proponents as well as detractors within the ongoing commodification debate have become more sensitized as well as cautious concerning the capacity, scope and overall ambition for PES initiatives worldwide (Prudham, 2007; Gómez-Baggethun & Ruiz-Pérez, 2011; Gómez-Baggethun & Muradian, 2015).”