The Environment as a Commodity

By A. Vatn. 2000

170 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2a8d90681514ca6d7a645c4ff664a9610019f411

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Measuring dispositions for lexicographic preferences of environmental goods: integrating economics, psychology and ethics (2003, background): “…1988; Sagoff 1988, 1998; Sen 1977); amibivalence between hard-to-compare values (Opaluch and Segerson 1989); inability to commodify environmental goods (Vatn 2000); religious-cultural doctrines (Earl 1986); or the essentiality of a good (life support priorities) (Lockwood 1996; Schmidtz 2000).”
Environmental Valuation Analysis, Public Deliberation, and their Pragmatic Syntheses: A Critical Appraisal (2001, unknown): “As Vatn (2000) has noted, the concept of marginal analysis, upon which economic calculus is predicated, proves difficult to define, or irrelevant, because of the inherent characteristics of many environmental problems: `̀ The problem is how to protect systems resilience, not to search for marginal…”
Economic valuation and the commodification of ecosystem services (2011, background): “The attempt to compartmentalize ecosystem services as discrete units, however, is at odds with the fact that ecosystem functions are inextricably linked to each other (Vatn, 2000).”
An institutional analysis of methods for environmental appraisal (2009, unknown): “take on a special, abstracted form, a form which fits the tenets of the model ( Vatn 2000; Vatn”
THE MEANING OF AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY: EVIDENCE FROM A CONJOINT CHOICE SURVEY (2008, background): “The outcome of such experiment may be better informed and would take into account public interests (Sagoff, 1998; Spash and Hanley, 1995; Vatn, 2000; Wilson and Howarth, 2002).”
Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism (2010, background): “neglects the relational aspects of nature and masks the fact that each ecosystem function is dependent upon others (Vatn, 2000).”
Value of recreational fishing in the Brazilian Pantanal: a travel cost analysis using count data models (2002, unknown): “Non-market valuation of natural resources, ecosystems and the environment is among the most debated topics in the recent economics literature (Mitchell and Carson, 1989; Arrow et al., 1993; Gowdy, 1997; Bromley, 1998; Brown and Gregory, 1999; Vatn, 2000; Mainwaring, 2001).”
Ethical Considerations in On-Ground Applications of the Ecosystem Services Concept (2012, unknown): “2008, Vatn 2010). For example, Vatn (2010) argues that while PES may strengthen community 297”
Are We Consuming Too Much (2004, unknown): “42 The example is taken from Dasgupta (1990) and Chichilnisky (1994).”
Social Metabolism, Ecological Distribution Conflicts, and Valuation Languages (2010, background): “The idea is to transfer market concepts to non-markets domains (Vatn, 2000).”
Deliberative monetary valuation (DMV): Issues in combining economic and political processes to value environmental change (2007, unknown): “Environmental valuation under CBA borrows directly from the idealised market process (Vatn, 2000).”
Offsetting Benefits? Analyzing Access to Forest Carbon (2010, unknown): “They have emphasized that ecological ills can be caused by both missing and existing markets and that nature's commodification(1) has many methodological and moral pitfalls (Harvey, 1996; O'Neill, 2001; 2007; Vatn, 2000).”
Soil “Ecosystem” Services and Natural Capital: Critical Appraisal of Research on Uncertain Ground (2016, background): “It seems reasonable to consider that regardless of its original intent, the association of prices with ecosystem services paves the way toward their privatization and commodification (Vatn, 2000; Jax et al., 2013; Boeraeve et al., 2015; Walter et al., 2015).”
Problematizing REDD+ as an experiment in payments for ecosystem services (2012, background): “com Dividing nature in a collection of ecosystem services is a scientifically-driven process that, taken out of context, may render invisible the inter-connectedness of ecosystem elements and processes and obscure the way in which such inter-connectedness affects the ‘performance’ of single ecosyste”
The Equity and Legitimacy of Markets for Ecosystem Services (2007, background): “However, markets for ecosystem services are not like standard markets for goods, with autonomously evolving institutional arrangements and with a long evolution and maturation (Vatn, 2000).”