The Impact of Three Evidence-Based Programmes Delivered in Public Systems in Birmingham, UK

By M. Little, V. Berry, Louise Morpeth, S. Blower, N. Axford, R. Taylor, T. Bywater, M. Lehtonen, K. Tobin. 2012

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9d084a69a5708c8faabfa4fa075b9416bbd3ab4f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Michael Wigelsworth
2. Ann Lendrum
3. R. Abenavoli
4. Jeremy Oldfield
5. C. Emery
6. A. Scott
7. I. T. Bokkel
8. K. Tate

Citations in the corpus

• Universal Interventions: Fully Exploring Their Impacts and Potential to Produce Population-Level Impacts (2017, background): “For these reasons, when posttest-only 56 M. T. GREENBERG AND R. ABENAVOLI studies conclude that there are no impacts (Little et al., 2012), such results are at best inconclusive.”
• The impact of trial stage, developer involvement and international transferability on universal social and emotional learning programme outcomes: a meta-analysis (2016, background): “results in England (Little et al., 2012) to mixed effects in Switzerland (treatment effects were identified for only some outcomes) (Malti, Ribeaud, & Eisner, 2012).”