How Efficient Are Emotional Intelligence Trainings: A Meta-Analysis

By Sabina Hodzic, Jana Scharfen, Pilar Ripoll, Heinz Holling, Franck Zenasni. 2018

302 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9cbe85014bb5d98dafc226735ceeed36e5aa21f0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Micaela Bucich
2. L. Brown
3. Kit S. Double
4. C. MacCann
5. Yixin Jiang
6. A. Minbashian

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Micaela Bucich
2. L. Brown
3. Kit S. Double
4. C. MacCann
5. Yixin Jiang
6. A. Minbashian

In Social Psychology

1. Micaela Bucich
2. L. Brown
3. Kit S. Double
4. C. MacCann
5. Yixin Jiang
6. A. Minbashian

Citations in the corpus

• Emotional intelligence predicts academic performance: A meta-analysis. (2019, background): “Hodzic et al. found that programs based on the ability model were significantly more effective than those based on mixed models (g .60 vs. .31), and that emotion understanding showed the largest increase of all the ability EI branches—significantly more than emotion facilitation (g .69 vs. .42). Tha”