An investigation into native and non-native teachers' judgments of oral English performance: A mixed methods approach

By Youn-hee Kim. 2009

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9c7dd1dadc05691c1f61a548270a9e0b2c9dadfc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

1. Paula M. Winke
2. Okim Kang
3. S. Gass
4. Luke Plonsky
5. Kazuya Saito
6. T. Isaacs
7. Sungmook Choi
8. P. Trofimovich

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Paula M. Winke
2. Okim Kang
3. S. Gass
4. Luke Plonsky
5. Kazuya Saito

Citations in the corpus

• Raters’ L2 background as a potential source of bias in rating oral performance (2013, background): “, 2011), or by being native-speakers of the test takers’ L1 (Brown, 1995; Kim, 2009; Xi & Mollaun, 2009, 2011; Zhang & Elder, 2011).”
• Impact of Rater Characteristics and Prosodic Features of Speaker Accentedness on Ratings of International Teaching Assistants' Oral Performance (2012, background): “Most studies investigating the difference of ratings between native speaker (NS) listeners and NNS listeners have been conducted with NS and NNS teachers rating NNS students’ speech performance (e.g., Fayer & Krasinski, 1987; Hadden, 1991; Kim, 2009).”