Grades and the Student Evaluation of Instruction: A Test of the Reciprocity Effect

By D. Clayson, Taggart F. Frost, M. J. Sheffet. 2006

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9c791a9440ecb65431077b175e1fe2e2f5de4993

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Wolfgang Stroebe
2. D. Clayson
3. Bert Brockx
4. D. Mortelmans
5. P. Spooren
6. Philip B. Stark
7. Richard L. Freishtat

In Social Psychology

1. Wolfgang Stroebe
2. D. Clayson
3. B. Nijstad
4. Eric Rietzschel
5. Paul B. Paulus
6. V. Glăveanu
7. Barry L. Bayus

Citations in the corpus

• Student Evaluations of Teaching: Are They Related to What Students Learn? (2009, background): “Clayson et al. (2005) maintain that the only hypothesis supported by all the data is reciprocity.”
• Student Evaluations of Teaching Encourages Poor Teaching and Contributes to Grade Inflation: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis (2020, result): “The same pattern was reported by Clayson et al. (2006) in a study of 499 students of undergraduate business courses.”