Marketing and technology resource complementarity : An analysis of their Interaction Effect in two environmental contexts
By Michael Song, C. Droge, Sangphet Hanvanich, Roger J. Calantone. 2005
912 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9b483c21bff4250519ef58ed4fe5d626746254b9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Ralf Wilden
- Siegfried P. Gudergan
- Paul A. Pavlou
- Omar El Sawy
- Taina Eriksson
- J. Cadogan
- N. Boso
- V. Story
In Strategy and Management
- Aron O'Cass
- Ralf Wilden
- Paul W. Beamish
- Luis Filipe Lages
- Andrew Delios
- Paul A. Pavlou
- N. Boso
- Siegfried P. Gudergan
Citations in the corpus
- The impact of dynamic capabilities on operational marketing and technological capabilities: investigating the role of environmental turbulence (2015, background): “These capabilities reflect an organizational capacity to link with and serve particular customer groups (Danneels 2008; Day 1994; Song et al. 2005).”
- An Examination of Exploration and Exploitation Capabilities: Implications for Product Innovation and Market Performance (2007, methodology): “…Roger J. Calantone, and David A. Griffith Dynamic capabilities refer to the development of organizational, functional, and technological skills employed to gain/ sustain competitive advantage (Eisenhardt and Martin 2000; Griffith and Harvey 2001; Song et al. 2005; Teece, Pisano, and Shuen 1997).”
- In Search of Innovation and Customer‐related Performance Superiority: The Role of Market Orientation, Marketing Capability, and Innovation Capability Interactions (2012, background): “This finding is particularly anomalous, given that strategic management research has historically recognized the important role that innovation and marketing play in determining firm performance (Hult, Ketchen, and Slater, 2005; Moorman and Rust, 1999; Song et al., 2005; Vorhies et al., 2009).”
- The Trade-off between Customer and Technology Orientations: Impact on Innovation Capabilities and Export Performance (2011, background): “The resource-based theory posits that complementary resources achieve synergistic effects on performance; however, leveraging every resource is not possible (Song et al. 2005).”
- Firm Innovativeness and Export Performance: Environmental, Networking, and Structural Contingencies (2013, methodology): “…as a first-order latent variable of its two observed indicators: self-reported export profit (before tax) and self-reported export sales turnover.4 Second, we relied on methods from Song et al. (2005) and Little, Bovaird, and Widaman (2006) to orthogonalize the raw scores of the constructs.”
- Pricing orientation, pricing capabilities, and firm performance (2013, background): “The use of subjective performance measures is warranted for a number of reasons: since firms in our sample are from many geographical zones, a multidimensional measure based on perceptual firm performance facilitates comparisons across firms and contexts, such as across industries, time horizons, an”
- Achieving Superior SME Performance: Overarching Role of Marketing, Innovation, and Learning Capabilities (2013, background): “For example, Song et al. (2005) find that technological capability complement with marketing capability to achieve better performance.”
- Multinational Firm Knowledge, use of Expatriates and Foreign Subsidiary Performance (2010, neutral): “Because a brand is valuable, rare, and built on a series of cumulative investments in market development over time (Rossiter and Percy, 1997), it is often difficult to imitate, thus giving the firm sustainable competitive advantages (Capron and Hulland, 1999; Reddy et al., 1994; Song et al., 2005).”