The Psychology of Personnel Selection

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

New Talent Signals: Shiny New Objects or a Brave New World? (2016, unknown): “…2009), situational judgment tests (Christian, Edwards, &Bradley, 2010), 360- degree feedback ratings (Borman, 1997), resumés (Cole, Feild, & Stafford, 2005), letters of recommendations (Chamorro-Premuzic & Furnham, 2010), and supervisors’ ratings of performance (Viswesvaran, Schmidt, & Ones, 2005).”
EQ-nomics: Understanding the relationship between individual differences in Trait Emotional Intelligence and entrepreneurship (2011, background): “Given that trait EI is related to a wide range of self-constructs (Chamorro-Premuzic & Furnham, 2010), it would be important to demonstrate its incremental validity over other individual differences.”
Selecting teachers and prospective teachers: A meta-analysis (2018, methodology): “…past, selection methods for most kinds of employment and training were left up to selector judgment and intuition, occasionally with the help of methods as diverse as astrology, physiognomy (analysis of facial features) and graphology (analysis of hand-writing; Chamorro-Premuzic & Furnham, 2010).”
Employability and Career Success: Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Reality (2013, background): “However, as Chamorro-Premuzic and Furnham (2010) point out, ‘‘recruiters often ignore GPA when recommending selection and in some circumstances even recommend selecting candidates with lower GPA’’ (p.”