SPECIAL ISSUE: The Dynamics and Value of Ecosystem Services: Integrating Economic and Ecological Perspectives Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services

By S. Farber, Robert Costanza, M. Wilson. 2002

1,211 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9ae74f22d2ee50b9b619ca5694e0d6d1d6fdf7b4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Engineering

In Global and Planetary Change

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Citations in the corpus

Cost-benefit analysis in the context of ecosystem services for human well-being: A multidisciplinary critique (2011, background): “if these services are fundamental to the satisfaction of critical human needs and rights, then their further loss can no longer be compensated through trade-offs with other goods and services (Farber et al., 2002; Baumgärtner et al., 2006).”
Contingent valuation of ecotourism in Annapurna conservation area, Nepal: implications for sustainable park finance and local development. (2008, background): “2000; Bandara and Tisdell, 2003; de Mendonca et al., 2003; Baral et al., 2007b); the protection of habitats (vanKooten and Schmitz, 1992; Loomis and Gonzalez-Caban, 1998; Farber et al., 2002 ); protected areas (Moran, 1994; Hadker et al., 1997; Togridou et al., 2006); ecosystem services (Turner et ”
Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes (2006, background): “The extensive literature on ecosystem service valuation has shown that each of these methods has its strengths and weaknesses (see for example Farber et al., 2002; Wilson and Howarth, 2002).”
Urban forests and pollution mitigation: analyzing ecosystem services and disservices. (2011, methodology): “By having this knowledge, decision makers can weigh the benefits against the costs of urban forest management and policy alternatives allowing for better informed decisions on issues related to urban forests and pollution mitigation (Dobbs et al., 2011; Farber et al., 2002; Heal, 2000; Kroeger and C”
Ecosystem services inclusive strategic environmental assessment (2013, background): “…contribution to decision-making include ambiguities in the definitions of key terms (e.g. ecosystems processes, functions and services) (Wallace, 2007), fragilities in economic methodologies, subjective valuation (Farber et al., 2002) and ES approaches leading to too resource-intensive activities.”
When, Where, and How Nature Matters for Ecosystem Services: Challenges for the Next Generation of Ecosystem Service Models (2017, background): “For short time scales, temporally disaggregating beneficiaries is typically done through a market discount rate in which the present value of benefits received at a point in the future is discounted by some annual percentage (Farber et al. 2002).”
SPECIAL ISSUE: The Dynamics and Value of Ecosystem Services: Integrating Economic and Ecological Perspectives Evaluating scale dependence of ecosystem service valuation: a comparison of NOAA-AVHRR and Landsat TM datasets (2002, background): “in this issue is the problem of appropriately valuing these functions, goods, and services (Farber et al., 2002).”
Landscapes' Capacities to Provide Ecosystem Services - a Concept for Land-Cover Based Assessments (2009, background): “In this sense, there is no either-or among ecological and economic evaluation methods (Farber et al. 2002).”
Miscanthus: A Promising Biomass Crop (2010, neutral): “Traditionally, it has been difficult and nebulous to value the ecosystem services provided by perennial agriculture (Farber et al., 2002; Liu et al., 2010; Porter et al., 2009), and without a harvested product for sale, 78 E.”
External Costs of Agricultural Production in the United States (2004, background): “Keywords: adverse effects, agriculture, externalities, valuation”
Ecosystem services and agriculture: Cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits (2007, background): “In such cases, the value of ES to them can be estimated from their willingness to supply those ES in exchange for minimal compensation (referred to as “willingness to accept” [WTA]).”
Confronting unfamiliarity with ecosystem functions: The case for an ecosystem service approach to environmental valuation with stated preference methods (2008, background): “Ecosystem functions and the benefits humans derive from them have become a central topic of research at the interface of social and natural systems (Costanza et al., 1997; Daily, 1997; Carpenter and Turner, 2000; Farber et al., 2002; Alcamo et al., 2003; Heal et al., 2005).”