Cost-benefit analysis in the context of ecosystem services for human well-being: A multidisciplinary critique

By G. Wegner, U. Pascual. 2011

326 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/135ad570b050fc2620ecae0768b367261384b776

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Fairly efficient, efficiently fair: Lessons from designing and testing payment schemes for ecosystem services in Asia (2015, background): “Therefore, it is important to seek evidence and support the theory of plural dimensions of human well-being when incorporating poverty reduction elements to the PES design and implementation (Wegner and Pascual, 2011).”
Transcendental values and the valuation and management of ecosystem services (2016, background): “…contextual values, but a wide range of different value expressions based on TVs, including rights-, duty- and virtue-based judgements (e.g. Keat, 1997; Clark, Burgess and Harrison, 2000; O'Neill, Holland and Light, 2008; Spash et al. 2009; Liebe et al. 2011; Wegner and Pascual, 2011; Kenter, 2016).”
Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment. (2014, background): “Consequently, rather than conducting all scientific efforts for onverting biophysical and socio-cultural properties into monetary alues, we call for a multi-dimensional and pluralistic methodlogical framework that engender multi-metric information about rreducible and incommensurable value dimension”
Ecosystem Services: Origins, Contributions, Pitfalls, and Alternatives (2013, background): “See Wegner and Pascual (2011) for a more detailed exposition.”
Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Cost-Benefit Analysis: Comparing alternative frameworks for integrated valuation of ecosystem services (2016, unknown): “MCDA is also expected to provide a compatible methodological framework for deliberative valuation, which is considered helpful in addressing plural value dimensions related to common goods such as ecosystem services (Vatn 2009; Wegner and Pascual 2011).”
What are shared and social values of ecosystems (2015, background): “…approaches have considerable advantages, there remains debate about whether they should augment, complement, or replace cost–benefit as the principal tool for welfare assessment (O'Neill, 1996; Price, 2000; Holland, 2002b; Bebbington et al., 2007; Wegner and Pascual, 2011; Parks and Gowdy, 2013).”
Ecosystem services (2011, unknown): “Wegner and Pascual (2011) have also provided a critique of economic cost-benefit methods, and argued that when dealing with public ecosystem services we need more pluralistic approaches to articulating the values that people hold and that, although traditional approaches have a place, we must not…”
Valuing nature's contributions to people: the IPBES approach (2017, background): “It is useful to bridge values which are expressions of personal utility or motivated by other factors, such as moral or ethical considerations and thus different to be integrated through modelling [40].”
Soil “Ecosystem” Services and Natural Capital: Critical Appraisal of Research on Uncertain Ground (2016, background): “Actually, it would even make sense to envisage negative discounting rates (Gowdy et al., 2010; Wegner and Pascual, 2011).”