Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes

By R.W.J. de Groot. 2006

956 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/630ef9a69ea01d4d0a89193f71408a3b61245236

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Research, part of a Special Feature on Sustaining Ecosystem Services in Cultural Landscapes: Analysis and Management Options A Classification of Landscape Services to Support Local Landscape Planning (2014, background): “For some (Constanza 1997, MEA 2003, Wallace 2007), 'function' is synonymous with 'ecosystem process, ' whereas for others, 'function' means the capacity of ecosystems to provide goods and services (de Groot 2006, de Groot et al. 2002, 2010).”
European agricultural landscapes, common agricultural policy and ecosystem services: a review (2013, background): “The aesthetic function of, for instance, hedgerows and tree lines potentially delivers cultural and recreational services (de Groot 2006, 2010).”
Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda (2012, background): “Interest in spiritual and religious significance and values attributed to certain aspects of nature has been growing (91, 92), as reflected in their inclusion as a subcategory of cultural ES (18, 93, 94).”
The conservation against development paradigm in protected areas: Valuation of ecosystem services in the Doñana social-ecological system (southwestern Spain) (2011, background): “Additionally, the private benefits of conversion are often exaggerated by intervention failures, such as environmentally harmful subsidies (e.g., Common Agricultural Policy) (de Groot, 2006).”
The Concept of Ecosystem Services Regarding Landscape Research: A Review (2011, methodology): “…ecosystem services in order to integrate the concept into decision making processes (Costanza et al., 1997; Wilson and Carpenter, 1999; Heal, 2000; de Groot et al., 2002; MEA, 2003; Turner et al., 2003; MEA, 2005; de Groot, 2006; Fisher et al., 2009; de Groot et al., 2010; Rounsevell et al., 2010).”
Uncovering Ecosystem Service Bundles through Social Preferences (2012, background): “Although different studies have recognized that ecosystem service assessments should incorporate ecological, socio-cultural, and monetary values [10,69], most studies restrict their analysis to biophysical and monetary factors [12,17], leaving the assessment of the socio-cultural values of ecosystem”
Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. (2009, background): “The project makes explicit links between ecosystem functions and stakeholder interests (de Groot, 2006), evident for example between: production functions and farmers; regulation functions and flood risk managers; habitat functions and biodiversity managers; carrier functions and floodplain…”
Land use functions — a multifunctionality approach to assess the impact of land use changes on land use sustainability (2008, background): “The concept of functions is particularly useful in sustainable land development as a framework to identify the multiple environmental, social and economic functions of land use (Wiggering et al., 2003; De Groot, 2006).”
Multi-functional landscapes in semi arid environments: implications for biodiversity and ecosystem services (2010, background): “A recent development, focused at a landscape scale (several thousand hectares), is the notion of landscape multi-functionality, which moves away from the traditional management of a single function landscape manipulated to, for example, either produce food or serve as a recreation area, to a landsca”
Indicators of ecosystem service potential at European scales: Mapping marginal changes and trade-offs (2012, neutral): “…(e.g. Bindraban et al., 2000; Leibowitz et al., 2000; Wu et al., 2003; Peterseil et al., 2004; Wrbka et al., 2004; Fohrer et al., 2005; De Groot, 2006; Egoh et al., 2008; Naidoo et al., 2008; Verburg et al., 2008; Willemen et al., 2008; Nelson et al., 2009; Burkhard et al., 2009; Maes et…”