SPECIAL ISSUE: The Dynamics and Value of Ecosystem Services: Integrating Economic and Ecological Perspectives Evaluating scale dependence of ecosystem service valuation: a comparison of NOAA-AVHRR…
By Keri M. Konarska, Paul C. Sutton, M. Castellon. 2002
140 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5de689312fb1e2936cd3320765074b8ee71ebb52
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Robert Costanza
- Joachim Maes
- Paul C. Sutton
- Luke Brander
- V. Hartje
- J. Schägner
- J. Gowdy
- Philippe C. Baveye
In Global and Planetary Change
- Paul C. Sutton
- Robert Costanza
- Joachim Maes
- Luke Brander
- J. Schägner
- V. Hartje
- J. Gowdy
- Philippe C. Baveye
Citations in the corpus
- Monetary accounting of ecosystem services: a test case for Limburg province, the Netherlands. (2015, unknown): “This influence was also demonstrated by Konarska et al. (2002), by comparing the ES value of land cover datasets with different scales.”
- Ecosystem service value assessment for constructed wetlands: A case study in Hangzhou, China (2008, methodology): “The CVM technique (Farber et al., 2002; Bateman et al., 2006) and the scale of estimation (Konarska et al., 2002; Lambert, 2003) are very important in economic valuation exercises.”
- SPECIAL ISSUE: The Dynamics and Value of Ecosystem Services: Integrating Economic and Ecological Perspectives Global estimates of market and non-market values derived from nighttime satellite imagery, land cover, and ecosystem service valuation (2002, background): “%ESP correlated significantly with the Eco-Deficit indicator of Wackernagel, and did not correlate at all with the 2001 Environmental Sustainability Index (Fig.”
- Soil “Ecosystem” Services and Natural Capital: Critical Appraisal of Research on Uncertain Ground (2016, background): “…the issue of scale can drastically complicate the quantification of soil services, as is also the case more generally for other ecosystem services (Konarska et al., 2002; Cohen et al., 2006; Hein et al., 2006; Glenk et al., 2012; Laterra et al., 2012; Setten et al., 2012; Kumar et al., 2013;…”
- Mapping ecosystem services' values: current practice and future prospects. (2013, methodology): “Konarska et al. (2002) use LCLU proxies and unit values to compare how different resolutions of LCLU datasets influence the results of total ESS values in the US.”