Formative versus Reflective Indicators in Organizational Measure Development: A Comparison and Empirical Illustration

By Adamantios Diamantopoulos, Judy A. Siguaw. 2006

3,427 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9a90c29021ef661dab27ad012a3b856f8517323c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices and Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Ethical Climates: An Employee Perspective (2013, background): “The difference in casual direction has profound implications for both measurement error and model estimation (Diamantopoulus and Siguaw 2006).”
Time pressure and team member creativity within R&D projects: The role of learning orientation and knowledge sourcing (2017, background): “30 (Diamantopoulos and Siguaw, 2006), which indicates that there are no serious multicollinearity issues.”
Marketing measurement revolution: the C-OAR-SE method and why it must replace psychometrics (2011, methodology): “The classification cannot be made empirically, contrary to the approach advocated by psychometricians such as Diamantopoulos and Sigauw (2006)”
Doing more with less? Employee reactions to psychological contract breach via target similarity or spillover during public sector organizational change (2014, neutral): “It is a formative measure, in which items are not necessarily tightly conceptually related (Coltman et al., 2008; Diamantopoulos & Siguaw, 2006; Diamantopoulos & Winklhofer, 2001).”
Integration of UTAUT model in internet banking adoption context (2019, background): “3 when comparing with endogenous variables (Diamantopoulos and Siguaw, 2006).”
Older adults: Are they ready to adopt health-related ICT? (2013, neutral): “5–3 used as multicollinearity utoff value [58,59].”
Advancing formative measurement models (2008, background): “, 2004) and criterionrelated (Diamantopoulos and Siguaw, 2006; Edwards, 2001; Jarvis et al., 2003) validity.”
An empirical investigation of employee portal success (2010, methodology): “All the values are below the commonly accepted threshold of 10 (Diamantopoulos and Siguaw, 2006; Gujarati, 2003).”
Shackled to the Status Quo: The Inhibiting Effects of Incumbent System Habit, Switching Costs, and Inertia on New System Acceptance (2012, background): “…formative dimensions of the construct), then eliminating items from the pool should be theoretically justified rather than merely based on empirical results (Bollen and Lennox 1991; Diamantopoulos and Siguaw 2006; Diamantopoulos and Winklhofer 2001; Diamantopoulos et al. 2008; Petter et al. 2007).”
Who influences whom? Analyzing workplace referents' social influence on IT adoption and non-adoption (2009, background): “For formative measures, (1) content validity (Straub et al ., 2004), (2) weights (Chin, 1998) and (3) multicollinearity (Diamantopoulos and Siguaw, 2006) should be evaluated.”
Formative Vs. Reflective Measurement Model: Guidelines for Structural Equation Modeling Research (2020, methodology): “reflective or formative based on its theoretical considerations ([14]; [15]; [20]).”