Relevance and Rigor: Executive Education as a Lever in Shaping Practice and Research

By Michael L. Tushman, Charles A. O'Reilly, A. Fenollosa, Adam M. Kleinbaum, Danielle G. McGrath. 2007

181 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management Information Systems, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9a6eac5a70cd0ac74bdd2fa2e8a3b25a48e1cf93

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. David Seidl

In Management Information Systems

1. Toby Marshall Egan
2. Yonjoo Cho

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Alexander T. Nicolai
2. Toby Marshall Egan
3. Yonjoo Cho
4. David Seidl

Citations in the corpus

• That’s Relevant! Different Forms of Practical Relevance in Management Science (2010, background): “…in management science to the use of jargon (e.g. Gulati 2007); setting the wrong research questions (e.g. Buckley et al. 1998); unclear implications (e.g. Davenport and Markus 1999); wrong incentives (e.g. Cohen 2007); or an underdeveloped transfer infrastructure (e.g. Tushman et al. 2007).”
• Action Learning Research: A Systematic Review and Conceptual Framework (2009, methodology): “Related literature suggests that action learning programs should be carefully implemented to ensure balance between action and learning (Kim, 2007; Kuhn & Marsick, 2005; Pedler, 2002; Raelin & Raelin, 2006; Tushman et al., 2007).”