Collective stress and coping in the context of organizational culture
By Hannakaisa Lansisalmi, José María Peiró, M. Kivimaki. 2000
140 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/99436cd85655487cd408ee438826b58cf91f0ac6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Hans De Witte
- José María Peiró
- J. Heames
- Lee D. Butterfield
- Asa-Sophia T. Maglio
- Michael G. Harvey
- William A. Borgen
- N. Amundson
In Sociology and Political Science
- J. Heames
- Lee D. Butterfield
- Asa-Sophia T. Maglio
- Hans De Witte
- José María Peiró
- Michael G. Harvey
- William A. Borgen
- N. Amundson
Citations in the corpus
- Workplace bullying: a cross‐level assessment (2006, background): “Initiating a collective sense of responsibility for the emotional stability of everyone, the victim/group/organization is able to create cohesion against the perpetrator of the negative behavior (Lansisalmi et al., 2000).”
- Fifty years of the critical incident technique: 1954-2004 and beyond (2005, methodology): “…for the data-collection method used, but then seemed to diverge from the data-analysis procedure as outlined by Flanagan (Cheek et al., 1997; Gottman and Clasen, 1972; Kent et al., 1996; Kirk, 1995; Lansisalmi et al., 2000; Miwa, 2000; Strop, 1995; Thomas et al., 1987; Vispoel and Austin, 1991).”
- Job insecurity climate's influence on employees' job attitudes: Evidence from two European countries (2009, background): “Moreover, Länsisalmi, Peiró, and Kivimäki (2000), with a qualitative approach, pointed out that stress had collective properties that were determined by organizations.”