Sharing Responsibility for Product Recovery Across the Supply Chain

By Brian W. Jacobs, Ravi Subramanian. 2012

210 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/993912980ec9aa28f5fe55e1cfef508d04e57d6a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Distribution Channel Choice and Divisional Conflict in Remanufacturing Operations (2020, background): “…chain, optimize proﬁt performance, and align each entity’s objective with that of the entire supply chain (Cachon 2003, Cachon and Lariviere 2005, Jacobs and Subramanian 2012) and that certain form of incentives can coordinate two departments within an organization (Balasubramanian and Bhardwaj…”
Green product design in supply chains under competition (2017, methodology): “…and using economic modeling approach, researchers further discuss green supply chain coordination issues (Zhang and Liu (2013), Swami and Shah (2013), Ghosh and Shah (2012), Ghosh and Shah (2015), and Jacobs and Subramanian (2012) etc.), which is the stream of the research our paper contributes to.”
Stakeholder Perspectives on E‐Waste Take‐Back Legislation (2013, background): “Jacobs and Subramanian (2012) considered supply chain conﬁguration under take-back legislation.”
Research advances in environmentally and socially sustainable operations (2012, background): “Jayaraman et al. (2003) discussed a reverse distribution problem involving issues of how many collection sites and refurbishing facilities to open and how returned products be transported.”
Closed-Loop Supply Chains: A Critical Review, and Future Research (2013, background): “Jacobs and Subramanian (2012) study the impact of τ and ω on supply chain profits and environmental impacts when responsibility for product take-back is shared across supply chain members.”
An Analysis of Monopolistic and Competitive Take‐Back Schemes for WEEE Recycling (2011, background): “Jacobs and Subramanian (2009) incorporate the possibility of sharing the take-back related costs between the producers and suppliers, and discuss the ensuing proﬁt and social welfare effects.”
Impact of Take‐Back Regulation on the Remanufacturing Industry (2017, methodology): “Such single-period, steady-state models have been frequently used in recent remanufacturing (e.g., Gal-breth et al. 2013, € Orsdemir et al. 2014) and take-back regulation literature (e.g., Atasu et al. 2009, Jacobs and Subramanian 2012).”