An Analysis of Monopolistic and Competitive Take‐Back Schemes for WEEE Recycling

By Fuminori Toyasaki, Tamer Boyacι, Vedat Verter. 2011

156 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bd29023283c222a1136467b4c76313e18d1ff560

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

In Mechanical Engineering

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Stakeholder Perspectives on E‐Waste Take‐Back Legislation (2013, background): “Toyasaki et al. (2011) investigated the impact of recycling competition on the efﬁ-ciency of take-back legislation.”
Sharing Responsibility for Product Recovery Across the Supply Chain (2012, background): “Recycling, on the other hand, typically exhibits economies of scale; we therefore assume a concave increasing recycling cost (e.g., Callan and Thomas 2001, Toyasaki et al. 2011).”
How Does Product Recovery Affect Quality Choice? (2013, background): “…design of welfare maximizing take-back legislation from a policy maker’s perspective (Atasu et al. 2009a, 2009b), or its impact on recycling markets (Toyasaki et al. 2011), while there is limited research on how ﬁrms react to the existence of product take-back legislation, from a product design…”
Promoting electric automobiles: supply chain analysis under a government’s subsidy incentive scheme (2013, background): “Toyasaki et al. (2011) analyzed and compared monopolistic and competitive take-back schemes for recycling waste electrical and electronic equipment.”
Closed-Loop Supply Chains: A Critical Review, and Future Research (2013, background): “Toyasaki, Boyaci, and Verter (2011) present a model of a CLSC with two manufacturers, two recyclers, and a market for recycled material, in the context of take-back legislation.”
Impact of Take‐Back Regulation on the Remanufacturing Industry (2017, background): “(Boyaci et al. 2010) How do individual and collective producer responsibility schemes compare?”
Extended Producer Responsibility for E‐Waste: Individual or Collective Producer Responsibility? (2012, background): “The constant l (0 < l < 1) captures the disparity in consumer preferences for the brands and is analogous to the degree of product substitut-ability modeled in Toyasaki et al. (2010).”