Rethinking the Role of Communicative Competence in Language Teaching
By M. Celce-Murcia. 2008
529 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/985083ef3413d01464720c9def07ae21b47b02d0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Language and Linguistics
- Naoko Taguchi
- Claudia van Kruistum
- L. D. Mey
- Chiel van der Veen
- Bert van Oers
- S. Youn
- Carsten Roever
- K. Bardovi-Harlig
In Literature and Literary Theory
Citations in the corpus
- The effect of productive classroom talk and metacommunication on young children's oral communicative competence and subject matter knowledge: An intervention study in early childhood education (2017, methodology): “Following the work of Schiefelbusch and Pickar (1984) and Celce-Murcia (2008), we use the term oral communicative competence to emphasize that it is about the combination of knowledge, skills and attitudes that “enables a speaker to communicate effectively and appropriately in social contexts”…”
- Contexts and pragmatics learning: Problems and opportunities of the study abroad research (2016, background): “Celce-Murcia (2007) proposed a model that involves interactional competence with two sub-components: ACTION COMPETENCE and CONVERSATION COMPETENCE.”
- Communicative language teaching (2022, unknown): “Pragmatics can be learned through interaction with people invited to the classroom and in the community Celce-Murcia (2007) advises that interaction go beyond the teacher-student conversation to capture the full effect of interpersonal communication outside discourse.”
- Validity argument for assessing L2 pragmatics in interaction using mixed methods (2015, background): “A pedagogically motivated model of communicative competence (Celce-Murcia, 2007; Celce-Murcia, Dörnyei, & Thurrell, 1995) and discursive pragmatics (Kasper, 2006) furnish conceptual resources in defining pragmatic competence in interaction.”